Ethyl carbamate in alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, vinegars, grain based breads and crackers and soy based products - April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2018 and April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022

Food chemistry - Targeted surveys - Final report

Summary

Targeted surveys provide information on potential food hazards and enhance the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's (CFIA's) routine monitoring programs. These surveys provide evidence regarding the safety of the food supply, identify potential emerging hazards, and contribute new information and data to food categories where it may be limited or non-existent. They are often used by the agency to focus surveillance on potential areas of higher risk. Surveys can also help to identify trends and provide information about how industry complies with Canadian regulations.

Ethyl carbamate (EC) is a chemical that unintentionally forms during the fermentation process. It can be found in alcoholic beverages and fermented foods such as bread, yogurt, soy products and fermented vegetablesFootnote 1, Footnote 2, Footnote 3. EC levels in these products can be affected by a wide range of factors, including processing and storage temperature, strain of yeast used, crop fertilization and exposure to sunlightFootnote 2, Footnote 3, Footnote 4, Footnote 5, Footnote 6. This compound is classified as 'probably carcinogenic to humans' by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)Footnote 7, and therefore may pose a health risk to the consumer.

This targeted survey generated further baseline surveillance data on the occurrence of EC in domestic and imported products on the Canadian market. The CFIA sampled and analyzed 1488 fermented products, including 615 alcoholic and 133 non-alcoholic beverages, 133 culinary vinegars, 286 grain based bread and cracker products and 404 soy based products. EC was detected in 14% of the samples tested, with levels ranging from 4.0 parts per billion (ppb) to 520 ppb. The highest level of EC was reported in an imported fermented bean curd sample. Comparison of the survey results to previous surveys and scientific literature showed that the levels of EC in Canadian retail products are similar to those reported in a variety of scientific studies.

Health Canada determined the levels of EC in food observed in this survey are not expected to pose a concern to human health, therefore there were no follow-up actions resulting from this survey.

What targeted surveys are

Targeted surveys are used by the CFIA to focus its surveillance activities on areas of highest health risk. The information gained from these surveys provides support for the allocation and prioritization of the agency's activities to areas of greater concern. Originally started as a project under the Food Safety Action Plan (FSAP), targeted surveys have been embedded in our regular surveillance activities since 2013. Targeted surveys are a valuable tool for generating information on certain hazards in foods, identifying and characterizing new and emerging hazards, informing trend analysis, prompting and refining health risk assessments, highlighting potential contamination issues, as well as assessing and promoting compliance with Canadian regulations.

Food safety is a shared responsibility. We work with federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments and provide regulatory oversight of the food industry to promote safe handling of foods throughout the food production chain. The food industry and retail sectors in Canada are responsible for the food they produce and sell, while individual consumers are responsible for the safe handling of the food they have in their possession.

Why we conducted this survey

The main objectives of this targeted survey were to generate further baseline surveillance data on the level of EC in alcoholic and no-alcoholic beverages, culinary vinegars, grain based breads and cracker and soy products on the Canadian retail market, and to compare the prevalence of EC in foods targeted in this survey with that of similar products in other targeted surveys and scientific literature.

EC is formed unintentionally during fermentation by the spontaneous reaction of urea and ethanol. During fermentation, some strains of yeast naturally produce urea and ethanol, which can react together to form ECFootnote 3, Footnote 4. EC levels in foods can be affected by a wide range of factors, including processing and storage temperature, strain of yeast present, crop fertilization and exposure to sunlightFootnote 2, Footnote 3, Footnote 4, Footnote 5, Footnote 6.

EC is classified as 'probably carcinogenic to humans' by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)Footnote 7. As such, Health Canada has set in place Maximum Levels (ML) for EC in various alcoholic beveragesFootnote 8. Due to this potential health risk, the CFIA considered it important to examine EC levels in other fermented foods available on the Canadian retail market.

What we sampled

A variety of domestic and imported fermented products including alcoholic and no-alcoholic beverages, culinary vinegars, grain based breads and cracker and soy products were sampled from April 1 to March 31 over the following survey years: 2016, 2017, 2020, and 2021. Samples of products were collected from local/regional retail locations located in 11 major cities across Canada. These cities encompassed 4 Canadian geographical areas:

  • Atlantic (Halifax and Moncton)
  • Quebec (Montreal and Quebec City)
  • Ontario (Toronto and Ottawa)
  • West (Calgary, Saskatoon, Vancouver, Victoria and Winnipeg)

The number of samples collected from these cities was in proportion to the relative population of the respective areas. The shelf life, storage conditions, and the cost of food on the open market were not considered in this survey. Refer to Table 1 for the product types collected in this survey.

Table 1. Distribution of survey samples based on product type and origin
Product type Number of domestic samples Number of imported samples Number of samples of unspecified origin Table Note a Total number of samples
Alcoholic beverages 206 336 73 615
Non-alcoholic beverages 50 64 19 133
Culinary vinegars 2 38 10 50
Grain based breads and crackers 58 66 162 286
Soy based products 113 227 64 404
Total 429 731 328 1488

How samples were analyzed and assessed

Samples were analyzed by an ISO 17025 accredited food testing laboratory under contract with the Government of Canada. The results are based on the food products as sold and not necessarily as they would be consumed.

Chemical contaminants in foods have regulatory levels established by Health Canada. Currently, these have been established for the presence of EC in certain types of alcoholic beverages. Health Canada has determined a maximum level (ML) of 35 ppb for EC in table wine, 100 ppb in fortified wines, 150 ppb in distilled spirits, 400 ppb in fruit brandies and liqueurs and 200 ppb in sake (rice wine)Footnote 8. Refer to Appendix A, Table A-1 for tabular format of MLs in alcoholic beverages established by Health Canada. Compliance is assessed against the established ML available when the survey was carried out. In the absence of a specific ML, the levels of EC may be assessed by Health Canada on a case-by-case basis using the most current scientific data. Any high results of EC are reviewed by Health Canada's Bureau of Chemical Safety to determine if the levels are harmful to consumers. Note that there are no Canadian regulatory limits for the remaining categories of products included in the survey.

Results of the survey

Of the 1488 samples tested, most (86%) did not have detected levels of EC. Table 2 illustrates the range of concentrations detected in the survey samples by product type.

Table 2. Overview of targeted survey results in 2016, 2017, 2020 and 2021
Product type Table Note b Number of samples Number of samples (%) with detected levels Minimum Table Note c (ppb) Maximum (ppb) Average Table Note d, Table Note e (ppb)
Alcoholic beverages 614 170 (28) 4.0 128 21.9
Non-alcoholic beverages 134 2 (2) 6.0 7.0 6.5
Culinary vinegars 50 0 (0) 0 0 0
Grain based breads and crackers 286 0 (0) 0 0 0
Soy based products 404 37 (9) 4.0 520 67.8
Total 1488 209 (14) 4.0 520 29.9

Alcoholic beverages

A wide variety of alcoholic beverages and distilled spirits were sampled within the following the following categories: 135 ciders, 151 distilled spirits, 65 fortified wines, 21 fruit brandies, 27 liqueurs, 54 sakes (rice wine) and 161 table wines. The highest level of EC was found in an imported sake wine (15.5% alcohol) at 128 ppb which was below Health Canada's ML of 200 ppb. All other alcoholic beverage samples that tested positive for EC were found to contain levels below the MLs, with the exception of 1 imported fortified plum wine (14% alcohol) which exceeded the ML of 100 ppb at 127ppb. Within the category of fortified wines, the compliance rate was 64 out of 65 samples screened or 98.5%, and 100% for all other categories of alcoholic beverages as no other samples exceeded the ML. Refer to Appendix A, Table A-1 for a detailed breakdown of the minimum, maximum, average levels of EC detected within each category of alcoholic beverages in ppb, as well as the number of compliant samples and percent compliance.

Although the rate of detection (percent positive samples) for alcoholic beverages is highest across all product types in Table 2, the majority of samples (72%) did not contain EC and the average level of EC detected was well below the ML and the maximum level detected. Refer to Appendix A, Table A-3 for additional detection rates.

Non-alcoholic beverages

A total of 134 non-alcoholic beverages were tested and included: 15 non-alcoholic ciders, 19 non-alcoholic table wines, 35 soft drinks and 65 fermented beverages; 52 of which were kombucha. Of the products tested, 2 samples were observed to contain EC levels, 1 of which was an imported de-alcoholized wine product at 7.0 ppb, and the other was in an imported fermented kombucha beverage at 6.0 ppb. Note that there were 19 non-alcoholic (de-alcoholized) wine samples tested, and 52 kombucha samples tested in this survey. The majority of samples tested in the non-alcoholic beverages category (98%) did not test positive for EC.

Culinary vinegars

A total of 50 culinary or cooking vinegars were tested. The category included 23 apple cider vinegars, 6 balsamic, 16 wine vinegars and 5 grain vinegars (grain and rice). There was a 0% detection rate for EC in culinary vinegars in this targeted survey.

Grain based breads and crackers

A total of 286 grain based products were tested. The products tested included 47 breads/buns, 44 bagels, 41 english muffins/crumpets, 36 flatbreads and 119 crackers/crisps. None of the grain based samples tested contained detectable levels of EC.

Soy based Products

A total of 404 fermented soy products were tested. Product categories tested included: 74 soy sauces,186 plant based protein sources (for example, tofu or tempeh), and 143 bean: curds, pastes, spreads and miso. In total, 37 samples were found to contain levels of EC ranging from 4 to 520 ppb. All of the samples that tested positive were imported products with the exception of 1 domestic plant-based protein product in which EC was detected at 7 ppb.

The highest levels of EC were detected in the soy product sub-category of bean curds. Of the 20 bean curds tested, 14 or 70% tested positive for EC and values ranged 19 ppb to 520 ppb, with 7 samples equal to or exceeding 100 ppb. All of the bean curds that contained EC were imported products outside of Canada and the United States.

What the survey results mean

The main objectives of this targeted survey were to expand upon the baseline data regarding the levels of EC in selected fermented foods on the Canadian retail market. The detection rates and the levels recorded for EC in the products tested in this targeted survey were comparable to those previously found in similar product types in previous surveys and in the scientific literatureFootnote 9, Footnote 10, Footnote 11, Footnote 12, Footnote 13, Footnote 14, Footnote 15, Footnote 16. Refer to Table 3 below. Some differences observed may be due to the specific type of product tested or the sample size.

Table 3. Minimum, maximum and average concentration levels of ethyl carbamate for alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, culinary vinegars, grain based breads and crackers and soy product categories across CFIA survey years 2016, 2017, 2020 and 2021
Product type Study Table Note f Number of samples Number of samples (%) with detected levels Minimum (ppb) Maximum (ppb) Average Table Note g (ppb)
Alcoholic beverages CFIA, 2021 108 53 (49) 4.2 128 23.8 Table Note g
Alcoholic beverages CFIA, 2020 79 58 (73) 4.0 100 25.7 Table Note g
Alcoholic beverages CFIA, 2018 Table Note f 265 31 (12) 4.0 86.0 14.8 Table Note g
Alcoholic beverages CFIA, 2017 137 41 (30) 4.0 127 19.5 Table Note g
Alcoholic beverages CFIA, 2016 290 18 (6) 4.0 19.0 9.7 Table Note f
Non-alcoholic beverages CFIA, 2020 100 1 (1) 6.0 6.0 N/A Table Note h
Non-alcoholic beverages CFIA, 2016 34 1 (3) 7.0 7.0 N/A Table Note h
Non-alcoholic beverages Tang et al., 2011 75 40 (53) N/D Table Note i 15.0 1.1
Non-alcoholic beverages Wang and Yen, 1998 22 N/A Table Note h N/D Table Note i 53.2 2.8 Table Note j
Culinary vinegars CFIA, 2020 50 0 (0) 0 0 0
Culinary vinegars CFIA, 2018 125 6 (5) 6.0 135 29.5 Table Note g
Culinary vinegars Kim et al., 2000 5 N/A Table Note h 0.3 2.5 1.2
Culinary vinegars Diachenko et al., 1992 6 N/A Table Note h 4.0 26.0 8.8
Grains based breads and crackers CFIA, 2017 286 0 (0) 0 0 0
Grains based breads and crackers Tang et al., 2011 40 25 (63) N/D Table Note i 8.6 2.0
Grains based breads and crackers Haddon et al., 1994 21 21 (100) 1.3 2.9 2.0 Table Note g
Grains based breads and crackers Vahl, 1993 33 33 (100) 0.8 12.0 3.4 Table Note g
Soy based products CFIA, 2021 156 2 (1) 5.5 100 52.8 Table Note g
Soy based products CFIA, 2020 73 9 (12) 16.5 520 145 Table Note g
Soy based products CFIA, 2019 Table Note f 100 6 (6) 4.0 217 74.1 Table Note g
Soy based products CFIA, 2016 175 26 (15) 4.0 328 42.3 Table Note g

The levels of EC observed in this survey were within the range reported in the literature in similar productsFootnote 9, Footnote 10, Footnote 11, Footnote 12, Footnote 13, Footnote 14, Footnote 15, Footnote 16. The larger sample sizes in this multi-year survey confirms that the occurrence of EC in products available on the Canadian market is low across product categories. The overall compliance rate for all alcoholic beverages with ML's included in this survey was 99.8%, which was due to one fortified wine sample exceeding the ML by 27 ppb, as noted in Appendix A, Table A-1.

Health Canada determined the levels of EC in food observed in this multi year survey are not expected to pose a concern to human health, therefore there were no product recalls resulting from this survey. Future EC surveys will look to broaden the CFIA's baseline knowledge on the levels present in fermented soy products and cooking wines.

Appendix A

Table A-1. Summary of results for the current targeted survey years: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2020-21 and 2021-22 and percent compliance with Health Canada maximum levels for ethyl carbamate in alcoholic beverages in parts per billion (ppb)Footnote 8
Alcoholic beverage Maximum levels (ML) of ethyl carbamate in parts per billion (ppb) Number of samples Number of positive samples Minimum (ppb) Maximum (ppb) Average Table Note k (ppb) Number of compliant samples Percent (%) of compliant samples
Table wines 35 161 18 4.0 19.0 9.3 161 100
Fortified wines 100 65 16 5 127 24.6 64 98.5
Sakes (rice wines) 200 54 23 5.0 128 50.2 54 100
Distilled spirits 150 151 99 4.0 97.0 17.0 151 100
Fruit brandies 400 21 11 5.0 98.2 25.0 21 100
Liqueurs 400 27 1 23.0 23.0 N/A Table Note l 27 100
Total 35 to 400 479 168 4.0 128 22.0 478 99.8
Table A-2. Breakdown of targeted survey product categories, number of samples tested, number of positive detected results and percent of samples positive for ethyl carbamate
Product category details Number of survey samples tested Number of positive samples Percent positive samples Table Note m (%)
Alcoholic beverage products 614 170 28
Beverage - alcoholic - table wine 161 18 11
Beverage - alcoholic - cider 135 2 1
alcoholic - cider (apple) 88 2
alcoholic - cider (pear) 30 0
alcoholic - cider (other fruit) 17 0
Beverage - alcoholic - liqueur 27 1 4
Beverage - alcoholic - fortified wine 65 16 25
Alcoholic - wine - fortified (port) 31 5
Alcoholic - wine - fortified (sherry) 20 8
Alcoholic - wine - fortified (madeira) 4 1
Alcoholic - wine - fortified (marsala) 7 1
Alcoholic - wine - fortified (plum) 2 1
Alcoholic - wine - fortified (blueberry) 1 0
Beverage - alcoholic - brandy 21 11 52
Beverage - alcoholic spirits - whiskey 151 99 66
alcoholic - whiskey (bourbon) 24 22 92
alcoholic - whiskey (irish) 12 5
alcoholic - whiskey (rum) 1 0
alcoholic - whiskey (rye) 84 66 79
alcoholic - whiskey (scotch) 17 6 35
alcoholic - whiskey (vodka) 2 0
alcoholic - whiskey (other) 11 0
Beverage - alcoholic - sake (rice wine) 54 23 43
Non-alcoholic beverage products 134 2 1
non-alcoholic -cider (apple) 15
non-alcoholic - wine (de-alcoholized) 19 1 5
non-alcoholic - soft drink (various types and flavors) 35
non-alcoholic - kombucha 52 1 2
non-alcoholic - kefir, kvas, dairy, other 13
Culinary vinegar products 50 0 0
Vinegar - apple cider 23 0
Vinegar - balsamic 6 0
Vinegar - wine 16 0
Vinegar - grain 5 0
Grain-based products 286 0 0
Grain-based - bread and bun 47 0
Grain-based - bagel 44 0
Grain-based - flatbread, naan, pita, tortilla, wrap 35 0
Grain-based - crumpet, english muffin 41 0
Grain-based - cracker, crisp, toast 119 0
Soy based products 404 37 9
Soy based product - soy sauce 75 16 21
Soy based product - plant based protein sources 186 1 1
Soy based - (tofu) 93 0
Soy based - (tempeh) 54 0
Soy based - vegetable protein (other) 5 1
Soy based - vegetable protein (textured) 7 0
Soy based - (burger, bacon, meatballs) 27 0
Soy product - beans, curds, pastes, spreads, miso 143 20 14
Soy based - bean curd 20 14 70
Soy based - miso 77 1 1
Soy based - soy and black bean paste, spreads 46 5 11
Total Table Note n 1488 209 14
Table A-3. Breakdown of targeted survey product category numbers of samples that tested positive for ethyl carbamate and minimum, maximum and average concentration level detected
Detailed Product Category Number of positive samples Minimum (ppb) Maximum (ppb) Average of (ppb)
Alcoholic beverage products 170 4 128 21.9
Beverage - alcoholic - table wine 18 4 19 9.3
Beverage - alcoholic - cider 2 6 17 11.5
alcohol - cider - apple 2 6 17 11.5
Beverage - alcoholic - liqueur 1 23 23 23.0
Beverage - alcoholic - fortified wine 16 5 127 24.6
alcohol - wine - fortified (port) 5 5 11 7.6
alcohol - wine - fortified (sherry) 8 7 41 20.9
alcohol - wine - fortified (madeira) 1 28 28 28
alcohol - wine - fortified (marsala) 1 34 34 34
alcohol - wine - fortified (plum) 1 127 127 127
Beverage - alcoholic - brandy 11 5 98.2 25
Beverage - alcoholic spirits - whiskey 99 4 97 17.0
alcohol - whiskey (bourbon) 22 8.6 97 25.1
alcohol - whiskey (Irish) 5 4.2 33 11.5
alcohol - whiskey (rye) 66 4 84.5 15.5
alcohol - whiskey (scotch) 6 5.3 14 8.7
Beverage - alcoholic - sake (rice wine) 23 5 128 50.2
Soy based products 37 4 520 67.8
Soy based product - soy sauce 16 4 57.1 13.5
Soy based product - plant based protein sources 1 7 7 7
soy based - vegetable protein (other) 1 7 7 7
Soy Products - beans, curds, pastes, spreads, miso 20 5.5 520 114
bean curd 14 19 520 154
miso 1 37.1 37.1 37.1
soy and black bean pastes and spreads 5 5.5 40 19.4
Non-alcoholic beverage products 2 6 7 6.5
Beverage - non-alcoholic - wine 1 7 7 7
Beverage - non-alcoholic - kombucha 1 6 6 6
Total 209 4 520 29.9