Food microbiology – Targeted surveys – Final report
Summary
A 4-year targeted surveyFootnote 1 analysed 699 samples of pasteurized goat, sheep, and water buffalo milk for the presence of the pathogens Salmonella species (spp.), and Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes). All samples were also tested for total coliforms and Aerobic Colony Count (ACC) which are indicators of the overall hygienic and sanitary conditions of the food supply chain from production to the point of sale.
Over 86.8% of the samples tested were found to be satisfactory. Salmonella spp., and L. monocytogenes were not found in any of the samples. ACC at elevated levels were found in 72 of the 699 (10.3%) samples. Total coliforms at elevated levels were found in 5 of the 699 (0.7%) samples. Both total coliforms and ACC at elevated levels were found in 15 of the 699 (2.1%) samples. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) conducted appropriate follow-up activities.
Overall, our survey results indicate that pasteurized goat, sheep, and water buffalo milk sold in Canada are generally safe for consumption. However, as with all foods, and especially those that are ready-to-eat (RTE) good hygienic practices are recommended for producers, retailers, and consumers.
Why was this survey conducted
The survey was conducted to generate baseline information on the quality and safety of pasteurized goat, sheep and water buffalo milk sold at retail in Canada. A similar surveyFootnote 2 was conducted from 2017 to 2020 of flavoured milk, however almost all of the samples tested were cow milk.
In Canada, milk undergoes pasteurization to kill any harmful bacteria that may be present in the raw milk. Therefore their presence in the final product may be due a variety of factors such as inadequate pasteurization, or contamination of the milk post-pasteurization. Given that milk is RTE, the possible presence of bacterial pathogens in the final product creates the potential for foodborne illness.
When was the survey conducted
The survey was conducted over a 3-year period from April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2023.
Where were the samples collected from
Samples were collected from national retail chains and local or regional grocery stores located in the following 11 major cities across Canada:
- Halifax
- Moncton
- Quebec City
- Montreal
- Toronto
- Ottawa
- Vancouver
- Victoria
- Calgary
- Saskatoon
- Winnipeg
The planned number of samples to be collected from each city was based on the population of the province in which the city was located relative to the total population of Canada.
How many and what kind of samples were collected
A total of 699 refrigerated, pasteurized goat, sheep, and water buffalo milk samples were collected. Shelf-stable products were excluded from this survey. A sample consisted of a single or multiple consumer sized packages of the same lot with a volume of at least 250 mL.
What were the samples tested for
All samples were tested for Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes, total coliforms, and ACC. Salmonella spp., and L. monocytogenes are pathogenic bacteria while total coliforms and ACC are indicators of the overall hygienic and sanitary conditions under which the samples have been produced, processed, stored, and transported. Elevated ACC (> 106 CFU/g) or coliform (> 103 CFU/g) levels detected during the shelf life of the product may contribute to spoilage and be an indicator of poor sanitation conditions throughout the food production chain from the rearing conditions of the mammals through to milk production and inadequate storage temperatures during transportation to the point of sale or while on display for sale at retail.
What methods were used to test the samples
Samples were analyzed using analytical methods published in Health Canada's Compendium of Analytical Methods for the Microbiological Analysis of FoodsFootnote 3 that were appropriate for the testing of goat, sheep and water buffalo milk.
How were the samples assessed
The samples were assessed using criteria based on the principles of the following Health Canada documents: Health Products and Food Branch Standards and Guidelines for Microbiological Safety of Food – An Interpretive SummaryFootnote 4 Policy on Listeria monocytogenes in Ready-to-Eat FoodsFootnote 5, the Food and Drugs ActFootnote 6 (Section 4(1)), and guidelines developed by international food safety authoritiesFootnote 7Footnote 8Footnote 9.
Bacteria | Satisfactory | Investigative | Unsatisfactory |
---|---|---|---|
Salmonella spp. | Not detected | Not applicable | Detected |
L. monocytogenes | Not detected | Not applicable | Detected |
Total coliforms | ≤ 103 CFU/g | > 103 CFU/g | Not applicable |
ACC | ≤ 106 CFU/g | > 106 CFU/g | Not applicable |
No assessment guidelines had been established in Canada for the presence of Salmonella spp. or indicator organisms in goat, sheep and water buffalo milk at the time of writing this report.
As Salmonella spp. is considered to be pathogenic to humans its presence was assessed as unsatisfactory as it is considered to be a violation of the Food and Drugs ActFootnote 6 Section 4(1)a.
The assessment guidelines for L. monocytogenes are based on Health Canada's Policy on Listeria monocytogenes in RTE foods and is dependent upon the sample type analysed (Category 1, 2A or 2B)Footnote 5. Fluid milks are considered to be Category 1 products (foods in which the growth of L. monocytogenes can occur).
Total coliforms are a group of bacteria that are commonly found in the environment and in the intestines of humans and animals. ACC is the total number of bacteria that are able to grow in an oxygenated (aerobic) environment. Unlike bacterial pathogens, both coliforms and ACC are generally harmless and are considered to be indicators of the microbial quality of food. Total coliforms and ACC are indicators of the conditions under which a food is produced, processed, packaged, and stored. Their levels in a food product are used to assess the overall sanitation conditions throughout the food chain from production to the point of sale. Their presence at some levels is tolerated, however elevated levels were assessed as investigative, possibly resulting in further follow-up actions.
What were the survey results
Over 86.8% of the samples tested were found to be satisfactory. Salmonella spp., and L. monocytogenes were not found in any of the samples. ACC at elevated levels (> 106 CFU/g) were found in 72 of the 699 (10.3%) samples. Total coliforms at elevated levels (> 103 CFU/g) were found in 5 of the 699 (0.7%) samples. Both total coliforms and ACC at elevated levels were found in 15 of the 699 (2.1%) samples.
Bacterial analysis | Number of samples tested | Satisfactory (%) | Investigative (%) | Unsatisfactory |
---|---|---|---|---|
Salmonella spp. | 699 | 607 | Not applicable | 0 |
L. monocytogenes | Not applicable | 0 | ||
Total coliforms | 5 | Not applicable | ||
ACC | 72 | Not applicable | ||
Total coliforms and ACC | 15 | Not applicable | ||
Total | 699 | 607 (86.8) | 92 (13.2) | 0 |
High levels of ACC (> 106 CFU/g) were primarily found in samples nearing the end of their shelf life.
Days remaining of product shelf lifeTable Note a when sampled | Number of samples tested (%) | Satisfactory | Investigative | Investigative (%) (ACC > 106 CFU/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
≤ 5 | 157 (22.5) | 117 | 40 | 39 (44.8) |
6 to 10 | 262 (37.5) | 226 | 36 | 33 (37.9) |
11 to 15 | 204 (29.2) | 188 | 16 | 15 (17.2) |
16 to 20 | 66 (9.4) | 66 | 0 | 0 |
21 to 25 | 10 (1.4) | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 699 | 607 | 92 | 87 (100) |
Survey results are also presented by the animal source (table 4), and production practice (table 5).
Animal source | Number of samples tested (%) | Satisfactory | Investigative |
---|---|---|---|
Goat | 628 (89.9) | 574 | 54 |
Water Buffalo | 42 (6.0) | 23 | 19 |
Sheep | 29 (4.1) | 10 | 19 |
Total | 699 | 607 | 92 |
Production practice | Number of samples tested (%) | Satisfactory | Investigative |
---|---|---|---|
Conventional | 664 (95.0) | 578 | 86 |
Organic | 35 (5.0) | 29 | 6 |
Total | 699 | 607 | 92 |
What do the survey results mean
A previous Canadian studyFootnote 2 also investigated the microbiological quality and safety of flavoured, pasteurized milk, however almost all (99.9%, 1493/1495) of the samples were from cows. Similar in both studies, L. monocytogenes was not detected in any of the samples. However, in the previous studyFootnote 2, ACC at levels > 106 CFU/g were found in 1.1% of the samples, while in this study ACC at levels > 106 CFU/g were found in 12.4% of the samples. This observation is most likely attributable to differences in the milk production systems between cows and other animals (goat, sheep, water buffalo). Contamination usually occurs during production (milking, storage, delivery)Footnote 10Footnote 11Footnote 12 and as the volume of production of cow's milk is significantly higher in Canada as compared to milk from other animalsFootnote 13, its production system is likely to be more refined (milking by machine vs. hand, shorter on-farm storage time) leading to milk of higher microbiological qualityFootnote 11Footnote 12.
All of the samples taken in both the current and previousFootnote 2 studies were from retail and all of the samples found to have ACC > 106 CFU/g had time remaining in their shelf life when sampled. This observation may have been a result of improper storage conditions during distribution and/or at retail as every 2ºC increase in temperature reduces the shelf life of pasteurized milk by 50%Footnote 14.
Overall, our survey results indicate that pasteurized sheep, goat, or water buffalo milk alternatives sold in Canada is generally safe for consumption. However, as with all foods, and especially with those that are RTE, good hygienic practices are recommended for producers, retailers and consumers.
What is done with the survey results
All results are used to:
- inform risk management decisions
- support program design and re-design
The investigative samples triggered appropriate follow-up activities including:
- follow-up with the manufacturer
- facility inspections
- review of manufacturer production, sanitation, hygiene, and distribution practices
- review of records, including product receiving procedures and company laboratory test results
Can I access the survey data
Yes. The data will be accessible on the Open Government Portal.