The biology of Zea mays L. (maize)

Biology document BIO2020-01: A companion document to Directive 94-08 (Dir94-08), Assessment Criteria for Determining Environmental Safety of Plant with Novel Traits.

This document replaces BIO1994-11 (The Biology of Zea mays (L.) (Maize)).

1. General administrative information
- 1.1 Background
- 1.2 Scope
2. Identity
- 2.1 Name(s)
- 2.2 Family
- 2.3 Synonym(s)
- 2.4 Common name(s)
- 2.5 Taxonomy and genetics
- 2.6 General description
3. Geographical distribution
- 3.1 Origin and history of introduction
- 3.2 Native range
- 3.3 Introduced range
- 3.4 Potential range in North America
- 3.5 Habitat
4. Biology
- 4.1 Reproductive biology
- 4.2 Breeding and seed production
- 4.3 Cultivation and use as a crop
- 4.4 Gene flow during commercial seed and biomass production
- 4.5 Cultivated Zea mays as a volunteer weed
  - 4.5.1 Cultural/mechanical control
  - 4.5.2 Chemical control
  - 4.5.3 Integrated weed management
  - 4.5.4 Biological control
- 4.6 Means of movement and dispersal
5. Related species of Zea mays
6. Potential interaction of Zea mays with other life forms
7. References

1. General administrative information

1.1 Background

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency's (CFIA) Plant and Biotechnology Risk Assessment (PBRA) unit is responsible for assessing the potential risk to the environment from the release of plants with novel traits (PNTs) into the Canadian environment.

Risk assessments conducted by the PBRA unit require biological information about the plant species being assessed. Therefore, these assessments can be done in conjunction with species-specific biology documents that provide the necessary biological information. When a PNT is assessed, these biology documents serve as companion documents to Dir94-08: Assessment Criteria for Determining Environmental Safety of Plants with Novel Traits.

1.2 Scope

This document is intended to provide background information on the biology of Zea mays, including

its identity
geographical distribution
reproductive biology
related species
the potential for gene introgression from mays into relatives
details of the life forms with which it has the potential to interact

Such information will be used during risk assessments conducted by the PBRA unit. Specifically, it may be used to characterize the potential risk from the release of the plant into the Canadian environment with regard to

weediness/invasiveness
gene flow
plant pest properties
impacts on other organisms
impact on biodiversity

2. Identity

2.1 Name(s)

Zea mays L. ^{Footnote 151}

2.2 Family

Poaceae (Gramineae) family, commonly known as the grass family^{Footnote 151} .

2.3 Synonym(s)

None^Footnote 87 ^{Footnote 151}.

2.4 Common name(s)

Zea mays is commonly referred to as Indian corn, corn, maize, maïs, blé d'Inde^Footnote 27 ^{Footnote 151}

2.5 Taxonomy and genetics

The genus Zea is a member of the tribe Andropogoneae of the grass family (Poaceae / Gramineae) ^{Footnote 151}. Andropogoneae comprises approximately 90 genera and over 1000 species, including sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) ^{Footnote 151} ^{Footnote 160}. There are 5 recognized species in the genus Zea, namely:

Zea diploperennis
Zea luxurians
Zea nicaraguensis
Zea perennis
Zea mays

Zea mays is subdivided into 4 subspecies, including:

m. subsp. huehuetenangensis
m. subsp. mexicana
m. subsp. parviglumis
m. subsp. mays^{Footnote 113} ^{Footnote 151}

Z. mays is diploid (2n = 20) ^{Footnote 113}.

Taxonomic position^{Footnote 151} ^{Footnote 153}
Taxon	Scientific name and common name
Kingdom	Plantae (plants)
Subkingdom	Tracheobionta (vascular plants)
Superdivision	Spermatophyta (seed plants)
Division	Magnoliophyta (flowering plants)
Class	Liliopsida (monocotyledons)
Subclass	Commelinidae
Order	Cyperales
Family	Poaceae / Gramineae (grass family)
Tribe	Andropogoneae
Genus	Zea L.
Species	Zea mays L.

2.6 General description

Corn is an erect annual grass which typically reaches 2 to 3 meters (m) in height and occasionally grows as tall as 7 m^Footnote 44 ^Footnote 54 ^{Footnote 157}. The plant possesses a single main culm with nodes and internodes and, depending upon genetic background and plant population density, will occasionally possess 1 to 2 lateral branches known as tillers in the lower leaf axils^Footnote 44 ^{Footnote 157}. Nodes gradually taper towards the top of the plant^Footnote 6.

Leaves of corn are broad and arranged in two vertical rows on opposite sides of the stalk. Leaf blades possess parallel veins with a prominent mid-rib. The upper surface of the leaf blade is hairy, while the lower surface is hairless. There is considerable variation in the number, size, and orientation of leaves amongst corn varieties, with temperate corn hybrids producing an average of 15 leaves and tropical hybrids producing up to 48 leaves^Footnote 44 ^Footnote 54 ^{Footnote 157}. The leaves and stalks of the plant are generally green; however, the accumulation of anthocyanins may result in a purple or reddish-brown colour.

Corn is a monoecious plant with imperfect flowers (that is, separate male and female flowers on the same plant). The male flower is called the tassel and the female flower is called the ear. The ear initial is covered in specialized leaves known as husks. Husks differ in appearance from the leaves on the stalk, with the function of surrounding and protecting the developing ear^{Footnote 141}. The cob consists of a robust rachi, with 4 to 30 rows of florets, each containing a single ovule. From each floret, a style will elongate towards the tip of the cob, forming long strands of tissue known as silks. The silks are covered by short hairs used to capture pollen grains^Footnote 81. Silk colour can vary from green to red, and following mechanical damage, silk tissues may turn brown due to oxidation of phenolic compounds^Footnote 93. Tassels are prominent branch structures located at the top of the corn plant and consist of a central spike and a variable number of lateral branches. Anthers can be yellow, purple, or red. After fertilization, the each ovule will develop into a kernel.

Grain and cob colour often vary between varieties. Cob colour can be white, red, purple, or brown. The pericarp (seed coat) of the kernel can be colourless, red, purple, or brown. The aleurone (outside layer of the endosperm tissue) can be blue, purple, or brown due to anthocyanins, white due to the lack of anthocyanins and carotenoids, or yellow or orange due to the presence of carotenoids^Footnote 93. Unique physicochemical characteristics produce a range of corn types including dent, flint, flour, pop, and sweet corn^{Footnote 137} (see Table: "Characteristics of corn types").

The root system of corn is seasonal with brace roots that start 2 or 3 joints above the ground and main roots that descend up to 2 m vertically and 1.2 m horizontally^Footnote 44 ^{Footnote 157}. Brace roots range in colour from green to red due to the presence of anthocyanins.

Characteristics of corn types
Type	Distinct characteristics
Flint	Kernels have a glassy outer shell and a high percentage of hard endosperm around a small soft centre^{Footnote 141}
Dent	Hard endosperm on sides and base of kernel with remainder of kernel filled with soft starch Soft starch at the top of kernel contracts during drying resulting in a small dimple (dent)^{Footnote 137} ^{Footnote 141}
Flour	Endosperm is composed primarily of soft starch allowing for easy grinding^{Footnote 141}
Popcorn	Kernels possess a high proportion of hard endosperm (higher than any other corn kernel) and a small amount of soft starch content^{Footnote 137} ^{Footnote 141}
Sweet	Grain is higher in sugar content than starch content due to one or more recessive mutations blocking the conversion of sugar to starch^Footnote 2 ^{Footnote 141} 3 separate gene mutations are responsible for sweetness in corn: su (normal sugary) se (sugary enhanced) sh2 (shrunken-2). The range of sweetness in corn is dependent on the gene, or the combination of the genes used for enhancement^Footnote 39

3. Geographical distribution

3.1 Origin and history of introduction

Corn was domesticated from the teosinte Z. mays subsp. parviglumis approximately 9,000 years ago^Footnote 50 ^{Footnote 107}, likely in the Balsas region of southwest Mexico^{Footnote 129} ^{Footnote 134}. The earliest archaeological evidence of corn was found in the Tehuacan Valley, Mexico, and is estimated to be ~8,700 years old^{Footnote 129}. Following domestication, corn spread throughout the Americas, cultivated by Indigenous peoples, which led to the establishment of open-pollinated ancestral landraces^Footnote 66.

Modern corn in the United States and Canada traces its origins to 2 of these landraces, the Northern Flints and the Southern Dents, which hybridized to form what is now referred to as the Corn Belt Dents^Footnote 49 ^{Footnote 157}. By the mid to late 1800s, open-pollinated varieties of corn developed from the Corn Belt Dents were cultivated. By the early 1900s, the inbred-hybrid concept had been proposed which led to greater uniformity of the varieties without loss of vigour, and is generally regarded as the beginnings of the hybrid corn era. By the 1940s, most corn acreage was hybrid varieties, rather than open-pollinated varieties^Footnote 49 ^Footnote 74 ^{Footnote 127}.

3.2 Native range

North America Mexico (Chihuahua, Durango, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Michoacán)^{Footnote 151}

South America Guatemala^{Footnote 151}

3.3 Introduced range

Corn is grown worldwide. The following 20 countries were the highest corn producing countries in 2017^Footnote 57.

Asia China, India, Indonesia, Philippines

Africa Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa, Ethiopia, Tanzania

North America Canada, Mexico, United States

South America Argentina, Brazil

Europe France, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Russian Federation, Ukraine

3.4 Potential range in North America

Corn possesses a wide potential distribution in Canada that includes all provinces and may continue to expand northward as temperatures increase and new varieties of corn are produced. Currently, field corn is grown in every province in Canada, with Ontario, Quebec, and Manitoba producing approximately 63%, 26%, and 9% of corn yield, respectively^{Footnote 146}. In the United States, corn is cultivated in every state for which there is survey data^{Footnote 153}. Iowa and Illinois account for nearly one-third of the national acreage^{Footnote 152}.

3.5 Habitat

Corn is a C4 grass best grown in warm, sub-humid climates with high rainfall (600 to 1500 millimeters) and long photoperiods^Footnote 6 ^Footnote 44 ^{Footnote 112} ^{Footnote 132}. Corn can be cultivated in tropical and warm temperate zones and is mostly grown between 40 degrees south in Chile and Argentina and 58 degrees north in Canada and Russia, at varying altitudes^Footnote 6 ^{Footnote 122}.

Corn is adapted to a wide variety of soil types ranging from sand to heavy clay, though corn performs best on well-structured soils with intermediate texture (sandy loams to clay loams)^{Footnote 112}. Typically, corn is grown on slightly acidic to neutral soil (pH 5.5-7)^Footnote 6 ^Footnote 44. Soil temperatures of at least 10 degrees Celsius (°C) are required for germination and emergence, while field temperatures of at least 18°C are optimal for germination^Footnote 44 ^Footnote 86 ^Footnote 95. Higher temperatures (30 to 33°C) are required for maximum plant growth^Footnote 14.

Corn is sensitive to drought stress, particularly at the flowering stage; however, it can temporarily tolerate dry conditions^Footnote 13 ^Footnote 40 ^{Footnote 112}. Frost can result in the loss of the entire crop ^Footnote 44 ^{Footnote 163}.

Generally, corn is incapable of sustained reproduction outside of domestic cultivation and is non-invasive of natural habitats, although it can volunteer in cultivated crops or grow in unmanaged fields or disturbed habitats (such as roadsides, areas around grain elevators, and fallow fields)^Footnote 68 ^{Footnote 113} ^{Footnote 141}.

4. Biology

4.1 Reproductive biology

Corn is a monoecious plant that reproduces naturally by seed. It is predominantly cross-pollinated by wind. Self-pollination is limited, occurring at a rate of approximately 5%, and influenced by the tassel size and environmental conditions at the time of pollen release^Footnote 9 ^Footnote 39 ^{Footnote 131}. Corn does not require insect mediated pollination for fertilization and the importance of insects for corn pollination is negligible^{Footnote 162}.

The growth stages of corn consist of 2 phases: vegetative and reproductive^{Footnote 135} ^{Footnote 141}. In the vegetative phase, leaves, roots, stems, and early reproductive structures develop^{Footnote 141}. The above-ground portion of the corn plant develops from the shoot apical meristem^Footnote 88. Leaves are initiated one at a time, with consecutive leaves arising from opposite sides of the shoot apical meristem, giving rise to an alternating leaf pattern. As each leaf is initiated, an axillary meristem is formed at the base of the leaf axil.

Once floral transition occurs (that is, switch from vegetative to reproductive growth), the shoot apical meristem transitions to an inflorescence apical meristem that will generate the tassel^Footnote 41 ^Footnote 88. Tassel development starts with the inflorescence apical meristem producing a series of lateral meristems; the first few are called branch meristems and are responsible for forming the tassel's major branches^Footnote 88. The subsequent lateral meristems (further removed from the vegetative shoot) form spikelet pair meristems, which can also form on branch meristems^Footnote 88 ^{Footnote 112}. Each spikelet pair meristem produces a short branch with two spikelet meristems, with each spikelet meristem producing a glume primordial and forming 2 floral meristems (upper and lower). Each floral meristem produces the floral organs (palea, 2 lodicules, 3 stamens, 1 pistil) and is supported by the lemma^Footnote 88. The pistil development is arrested and the imperfect male inflorescence results^Footnote 88.

Most axillary meristems will remain dormant; however, some of the lower ones may give rise to tillers and some of the upper ones will give rise to ear initials^Footnote 88 ^{Footnote 141}. Ears arise from axillary meristems that have transitioned into inflorescence meristems and then developed into ear initials through a reiterative process of meristem initiation and organ differentiation^{Footnote 109} ^{Footnote 159}. Each spikelet pair meristem will initiate a spikelet meristem and itself become a spikelet meristem. Each spikelet meristem will then initiate a floral meristem and itself become a floral meristem. The duration and rate of the reiterative process of spikelet pair meristem initiation determine the number of florets on the mature ear initial, with some evidence that later flowering genotypes develop more florets per row^Footnote 17. Each inflorescence is surrounded by modified sheaths (called husks) that act as a protective covering^Footnote 44 ^{Footnote 141}. Ears initiate the development of silk from their ovules. Silk development begins near the base of the ear and proceeds towards the tip of the ear over several days^Footnote 81.

Usually, synchrony occurs between pollen shed and silking resulting in high kernel set. However, severe plant stress such as drought can delay silking and reduce pollen grain production^Footnote 32 ^Footnote 73 ^{Footnote 112} ^{Footnote 141}. The interval between pollen shed and silk emergence is referred to as the anthesis-silking interval^Footnote 16 ^{Footnote 141}. Pollen is shed continuously for a week or more, releasing approximately 10 million pollen grains from each corn tassel^Footnote 9 ^Footnote 93 ^{Footnote 157}. Pollen can be released easily (for example, in response to vibration or low winds), and disperse short distances of up to 30 meters^Footnote 7. Once released from the tassel, pollen viability declines^Footnote 39. In some cases, horizontal winds allow pollen to disperse several hundred meters^Footnote 7 ^Footnote 9. Pollen grains fall from the tassels (anthesis) onto the silks of the ears, which are coated with sticky hairs that capture the pollen grains^Footnote 81). Pollen grains germinate immediately, extending a pollen tube into the silk strand, transferring genetic material to the female ovule for fertilization to occur.

4.2 Breeding and seed production

Corn breeding has evolved over the past century. Initially, growers used population improvement approaches to improve locally adapted open-pollinated varieties and often saved seed for planting the next year^{Footnote 130}. Modern corn breeding is almost exclusively focused on producing broadly adapted hybrids to be sold to growers. Corn exhibits heterosis or hybrid vigour, meaning that heterozygous hybrid progeny outperform their homozygous parents. Hybrid corn breeding is highly specialized and does not lend itself to saving seed for planting^{Footnote 110} ^{Footnote 165}. Hybrid-based breeding was first used in the early 1900s by breeders in the United States^Footnote 99 ^{Footnote 127}. Single crosses in hybrid breeding are achieved by crossing a male and a female inbred line (Line A × Line B = A × B). To increase vigour and yield, single crosses were substituted with double crosses, where 4 unrelated inbred lines are used in the production of 2 parent lines, which are then crossed resulting in the double cross hybrid seed (that is, (A × B) × (C × D))^{Footnote 141}.

Conventional breeding has been used to improve traits including yield, tolerance to high plant densities, canopy architecture, stalk and root strength, pest and disease resistance, tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, maturity, kernel composition, and nutrient content. Specialty corn varieties include food-grade, sweet corn, popcorn, and silage^Footnote 6 ^{Footnote 141}. Corn hybrids with superior yield potential have been continuously introduced in Canada over the last 40 years, resulting in annual yield increases of roughly 1.5%^{Footnote 117} ^{Footnote 141}. Several important mutations in corn arose spontaneously:

the 2 major genes for use in sweet corn, su1 and sh1
the reduced lignin mutation bm3 for use in silage
the wx1 mutation that results in >95% amylopectin starch in the kernel
the ae1 mutation that results in >65% amylose starch in the kernel for use in speciality starches^Footnote 39.

Growers regularly update their hybrid selection to remain competitive. To select hybrids, growers may use results from annual hybrid performance trials^{Footnote 121}, corn hybrid growing strips on their farms, and consideration of the crop heat units required for maturity^{Footnote 117}.

Many methods can be used to prevent self-pollination of the female parent line and to prevent cross-pollination with an undesired male parent line. These methods include manual emasculation (detasseling), application of male-specific gametocides, and the use of cytoplasmic or nuclear-encoded male sterility^{Footnote 128}. Cytoplasmic male-sterility is controlled by genes from both mitochondrial and nuclear genomes, whereas nuclear-encoded male sterility is controlled by nuclear encoded genes alone ^{Footnote 147} ^{Footnote 158} ^{Footnote 168}. Detasseling is the predominant method in commercial hybrid seed production in corn^{Footnote 140}. In breeding nurseries, receptive ear shoots are protected from unwanted pollination by ear shoot bags that cover the silks. Pollen produced from tassels is collected in bags that cover the tassels, often placed on the day before pollination^{Footnote 141}. Controlled hand pollinations are then made by exposing the ear shoot on the selected female parent and covering it with the bag containing pollen from the selected male parent.

Modern biotechnology has been used to introduce novel traits into corn including tolerance to herbicides and insect pests, increased ear biomass, dry-grind corn processing characteristics, improved digestibility, elevated levels of free lysine, and male sterility^Footnote 36. Often, multiple novel traits are combined in the same corn plant to convey tolerance to multiple pests and herbicides.

A male-sterile corn line that does not produce pollen was authorized by CFIA in 1996^Footnote 36. The introduced DNA includes the barnase gene which codes for the production of barnase ribonuclease in the tapetum cell layer of the anther at a specific stage in anther development. The barnase ribonuclease results in male-sterile plants by affecting RNA production, disrupting cell functioning, and arresting early anther development. Another corn line expresses the barstar gene which encodes a barnase ribonuclease inhibitor^{Footnote 158}. Crossing the barnase ribonuclease expressing plants with fertile barstar-expressing plants restores the fertility of F1 hybrids.

Insect tolerant corn expresses insecticidal protein(s) derived from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and/or ribonucleotides that interfere with and kill corn pests. Early Bt corn products expressing the Cry1Ab protein targeted the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis)^Footnote 33 . Subsequently, other Bt proteins conveying resistance to European corn borer have been authorized, including Cry1A(c), Cry1A.105, and Cry1F. Some Bt proteins convey tolerance to other lepidopteran corn pests including:

Western bean cutworm (Striacosta albicosta)
black cutworm (Agrotis ipsilon)
fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)
corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea)
beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua)
true armyworm (Mythimna unipuncta)^Footnote 28

Bt proteins active against the Western and Northern corn rootworms (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera and Diabrotica barberi) include Cry3Bb1^Footnote 34 , Cry34/35Ab1, mCry3a, and eCry3.1Ab. In 2015, corn with a RNA interference mode of action was authorized for unconfined release in Canada targeting corn rootworm^Footnote 35. A list of insect tolerant corn products available in Canada and the pests they target is maintained by the Canadian Corn Pest Coalition^Footnote 28.

Herbicide tolerant corn which allows growers to spray certain broad-spectrum herbicides after corn emergence was first authorized for unconfined release in Canada in 1996. Tolerance to herbicides is introduced by altering enzymes that already exist in corn to no longer be inhibited by the herbicide^Footnote 4 ^{Footnote 111} ^{Footnote 148}, or to introduce enzymes that break down the herbicide before it can damage the crop. Corn has been modified to express phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) enzymes, modified acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzymes, or modified 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) enzymes, which convey tolerance to glufosinate-ammonium, imidazolinones, and glyphosate herbicides, respectively. Other herbicide tolerant traits include tolerance to dicamba by incorporating the gene which encodes a DMO enzyme, tolerance to 2,4-D and certain aryloxyphenoxypropionate (fop) herbicides through the introduction of the AAD-1 protein, and tolerance to sethoxydim by altering the ACCase enzyme.

Corn is not covered by the variety registration system in Canada, having been exempted in 1996^Footnote 3. The Canadian corn industry (through the Canadian Seed Trade Association) maintains a database of commercially available corn hybrids^Footnote 3.

4.3 Cultivation and use as a crop

Corn is cultivated worldwide and represents a staple food for a significant proportion of the world's population. Corn grown for grain is the number one cereal crop worldwide with 1.13 billion tons produced in 2017^Footnote 57 ^{Footnote 113}; Canada was the 13th-highest producer with 14.1 million tons^Footnote 57. According to the 2016 Census of Agriculture^{Footnote 144}, 32,172 farms in Canada planted corn; in total, nearly 1.85 million hectares were planted (including corn for grain, silage, and sweet corn).

The majority of grain corn production occurs in Ontario and Quebec. In Ontario, the estimated seeding areas for grain corn are 891,300 hectares, of which 786,100 hectares are genetically modified. In Quebec, the estimated seeding area for grain corn is 382,500 hectares, of which 350,900 hectares are genetically modified^{Footnote 146}. Seeding rates vary depending on the variety of corn, fertility, and rainfall or irrigation. On soils with slow internal drainage, tillage can significantly increase the rate of soil drying and warming, and subsequently increase the possibility for earlier planting and the fast, uniform emergence of plants. Cultivation practices in corn often result in bare soil, which is susceptible to erosion by wind or water. No-till or other reduced tillage practices are used for some portion of corn production^Footnote 44 ^{Footnote 117}.

Cultivation of corn requires a well-prepared seedbed. Corn rows are typically planted 38 to 96 centimeter (cm) apart, at seed depths of 4 to 7.5 cm^{Footnote 117}. Planting seeds less than 3 cm deep may lead to less favorable positioning of the growing point and first nodal roots, possibly resulting in rootless corn syndrome and predisposing the seed to herbicide injury. Furthermore, if planted too shallow, corn will be more susceptible to poor root establishment in coarse-textured soils that dry rapidly. Conversely, deeper planting, especially early in the season when soils are cold, can significantly delay emergence compared to planting at depths of 3 to 5 cm^{Footnote 117}.

Corn Heat Units (CHUs) can describe the accumulation of thermal units above a base temperature in a region for a growing season and the heat requirements of a particular corn variety^{Footnote 103}. In Ontario, the average CHUs in a growing season ranges from <2,500 in northern growing regions to ~3500 in southwestern Ontario^{Footnote 117}. Highest yields are obtained from corn planted late-April to mid-May in Ontario^{Footnote 117}.

Corn is commonly grown in rotation with other crops including cereals (typically wheat), soybeans, and dry edible beans^{Footnote 102} ^{Footnote 117}. Crop rotation can help to decrease weeds, break up disease and pest cycles, and increase soil health^{Footnote 106} ^{Footnote 117}. Studies have shown that corn yield increases when grown in rotations^Footnote 5 ^Footnote 45 ^{Footnote 126}. Corn-soybean rotations have demonstrated a yield advantage of approximately 10% over corn grown in the absence of crop rotation^{Footnote 117} ^{Footnote 145}. Corn grown for grain or silage, and cultivated in the absence of crop rotation accounted for only 5% and 2% of Canadian production, respectively^{Footnote 145}.

Fertilizer is generally applied to the soil before corn is planted. Nitrogen can also be applied as side-dressing via surface or sub-surface placement near or between the plant rows. Corn responds well to fertilizer; rates depend on seasonal availability of soil moisture, cultivar selection, and environmental conditions^{Footnote 117}. The majority of nitrogen is usually applied in the spring, pre-plant, pre-emergence, or side-dressed before corn is over 30 cm tall. Fall application is not recommended because of the potential for high fertilizer losses^{Footnote 117}.

A Field Crop Protection Guide is published yearly by OMAFRA, recommending federally registered insecticides and fungicides for use in corn^{Footnote 118}. A wide range of herbicides can be used for weed control in corn. A Guide to Weed Control is published yearly by OMAFRA recommending federally registered herbicides for use in corn^{Footnote 116}.

Bt corn is commonly planted prophylactically for insect control^Footnote 72. In Canada, Bt corn hybrids were planted on 3.1 million acres in 2015, representing 85.8% of total corn acres^Footnote 51 . Insect pests developing resistance to Bt proteins expressed in corn has been a concern following the commercial release of Bt corn. Insect resistance management plans have been required by the CFIA to delay the evolution of resistance to Bt proteins by European corn borer and corn rootworms. Resistance by Western corn rootworm to Bt proteins is confirmed to multiple Bt proteins including Cry3Bb1^Footnote 59, mCry3a^Footnote 60 , and Cry34/35Ab1^Footnote 61. One resistant management strategy is to grow a specific percentage of refuge corn that does not express the Bt trait, either interspaced in the Bt corn field or planted in separate fields, or in structured areas within a Bt corn field^Footnote 28.

Common weeds in corn production in Canada include annual broadleaves such as

giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida)
lamb's-quarters (Chenopodium album)
cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium)
ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia)
wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis)
velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti)
lady's thumb (Persicaria maculosa)
wild buckwheat (Fallopia convolvulus)
eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptychanthum)

In addition, annual weedy grasses in corn include

giant foxtail (Setaria faberi)
proso millet (Panicum miliaceum)
fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)
barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli)
green foxtail (Setaria viridis)
yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca)
old witch grass (Panicum capillare)
crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis)^{Footnote 117}

Anthesis typically occurs approximately 60 days after emergence, and maturation of the crop is completed in 80 to 120 days, although this varies based on the latitude and environment^{Footnote 112} ^{Footnote 141}. Corn reaches physiological maturity when an abscission zone forms between the kernel and the cob tissue (black layering), usually when grain moisture content is 31 to 33%^{Footnote 117}. Grain moisture content is important in determining the harvest date. Harvesting grain with over 28% moisture may result in poor quality grain; high-quality food-grade grain may need to be harvested when grain moisture is 20 to 22%^Footnote 2 ^{Footnote 117}. Corn can be dried using 3 types of grain dryers:

in-bin
batch
continuous flow

Natural air drying may be used in warmer regions such as southern Ontario^{Footnote 117}. The drying temperature is dependent on the end-use of the corn, ranging from 45 to 120°C. Nutritional value is diminished once the temperature of corn grains exceeds 90 to 100°C^{Footnote 117} ^{Footnote 141}.

Corn grown in North America is predominantly of the yellow dent type, a commodity crop largely used as animal feed, either as grain or silage, and for ethanol fuel production^Footnote 2 ^{Footnote 145}. Corn may be processed by wet or dry milling depending on the desired end product. Dry milled products include:

cereal flakes
corn flour
corn grits
corn-meal
grits for beer production

Wet milled products include:

high-fructose corn syrup
glucose and dextrose
corn oil
starch
beverage alcohol
industrial alcohol
fuel ethanol^{Footnote 152}

Corn starch also serves as raw material for industrial manufacturing processes, including thickening, gelling, and binding agents for products like puddings, wallpaper paste, aspirin, chalk, and biodegradable plastics.

4.4 Gene flow during commercial seed and biomass production

Corn is a cross-pollinating species^Footnote 75. Corn pollen is primarily wind-dispersed and is viable for up to two hours, remaining viable longer under high humidity levels^Footnote 8 ^{Footnote 100}. A single plant may produce up to 2 million pollen grains per day depending on the variety; however, most modern hybrids have substantially smaller tassels resulting in decreased pollen production^Footnote 90.

The outcrossing rate is influenced by wind, the distance between the pollen source and receptor, and whether flowering and pollen shed occurs simultaneously^Footnote 76 ^Footnote 97. Halsey et al.^Footnote 76 observed an outcrossing rate of less than 0.01% when 500 m separated the pollen source and receptor when both crops were flowering at the same time. Bannert and Stamp^Footnote 9 determined that at distances of 50 to 4500 m between pollen donors and receptor fields, the cross-pollination rate in a field was always lower than 0.02%. Temporal separation of 2 weeks in the timing of flowering between corn crops reduced outcrossing; when flowering was separated by 2 weeks, the outcrossing rate was less than 0.01% at 62 m^Footnote 76. A combination of physical and temporal separation (750 m distance and 2 weeks separation between flowering) can achieve 100% genetic purity^Footnote 76. Field trials in Germany indicated that planting tall sunflower crops as a buffer between corn fields does not effectively reduce gene flow between corn crops^Footnote 97.

In Canada, the production of seeds grown for pedigreed status must meet standards specified by the Canadian Seed Growers' Association's Canadian Regulations and Procedures for Pedigreed Seed Crop Production (Circular 6). Border rows are used for crop isolation purposes and are required when the female parent is less than 200 m from the contaminating corn. When using border rows, the spacing between rows should not be less than 40 cm in width and must stay consistent throughout the field. For hybrid seed production, border rows are not required when the seed (female) parent is more than 200 m from the contaminating corn. Hybrid seed production is accomplished by interplanting rows of the male and female inbred parents (that is, 1 row of male to 4 female rows). With border rows of the male parent, the allowable distance from contaminating corn can be reduced^Footnote 31. The minimum isolation distances required for hybrid corn is dependent on the number of pollen (male parent) border rows in a field. For corn inbred lines or single crosses, an isolation distance of 200 m is required between the inspected seed corn crop and a source of potential contamination that is shedding pollen at the same time.

Although corn will hybridize successfully with the subspecies of Zea mays when close to each other^{Footnote 163}, this is not a concern in Canada as no Zea mays subspecies occur in Canada^Footnote 20 ^Footnote 65.

4.5 Cultivated Zea mays as a volunteer weed

Corn is not capable of sustained reproduction outside of domestic cultivation^{Footnote 113}. Human intervention is required to disseminate the seeds beyond the field where corn was previously planted because the seeds (kernels) on the ear are enclosed within a husk. Corn is not listed as a noxious weed in the Weed Seeds Order 2016^Footnote 71 and is not listed as a noxious weed in the United States^{Footnote 153}. Individual kernels distributed along pathways during travel from fields to storage facilities may germinate but are not regarded as serious weeds^{Footnote 113}.

Stalk lodging or breakage, dropped ears, and kernel loss during harvest (for example, via improperly adjusted combines and header shatter losses of dry grain) can result in volunteer corn the following year. Volunteer corn can shade the planted crop, interfere with harvest, and harbour pests^Footnote 37 ^{Footnote 106}. Individual kernels may overwinter and germinate the following spring, but generally will not persist as a weed^{Footnote 113}. Frost often kills volunteer corn in areas with cold winters^Footnote 2.

Despite the introduction of herbicide tolerant corn hybrids in Canada, herbicide tolerant corn volunteers can be adequately controlled using herbicides with other modes of action and cultural/mechanical controls^{Footnote 117} ^{Footnote 119}.

4.5.1 Cultural/mechanical control

Tillage is commonly used to control volunteer corn^{Footnote 117} ^{Footnote 119}. There are different tillage systems used in Ontario, including conventional tillage, fall mulch tillage, spring mulch tillage, vertical tillage, and fall strip-tillage^{Footnote 117}. Cover crop mulches (such as crimper-rolled rye) can also be used by growers to control weeds or volunteers, although these are not as effective as tillage^{Footnote 119} ^{Footnote 161}. Reducing equipment inefficiencies during harvesting such as properly adjusting combines can reduce the number of volunteers^{Footnote 113} ^{Footnote 141}.

4.5.2 Chemical control

Several herbicides are registered in Canada for volunteer corn control in canola, chickpeas, field peas, flax, beans, lentils, safflower, soybeans, sunflower, industrial hemp, sugarbeet, forage legumes (alfalfa, red clover, and bird's-foot trefoil), rutabaga, potatoes, barley, wheat (spring, durum, and winter), and many more^Footnote 79 ^{Footnote 120}. The active ingredients contained in the registered products are from

Group 1 (Fluazifop-P-butyl, Fenoxaprop- p-ethyl, Sethoxydim, Clethodim and Quizalofop-p-ethyl)
Group 2 (Thifensulfuron methyl, Tribenuron methyl, Imazamox and Imazethapyr)
Group 4 (MCPA)
Group 5 (Metribuzin)
Group 6 (Bromoxynil)
Group 9 (Glyphosate)
Group 10 (Glufosinate-ammonium) ^Footnote 79 ^{Footnote 119}

Group 1 herbicides, including the aryloxyphenoxypropionate (fop) and cyclohexanedione (dim) families, are most often used to control volunteer corn^{Footnote 119}.

Corn containing novel herbicide tolerance traits authorized in Canada as of 2020, include

Group 1 – corn with tolerance to sethoxydim and "fop" herbicides
Group 2 – imidazolinone and ALS-inhibiting herbicides
Group 4 – 2,4-D and dicamba
Group 9 – glyphosate
Group 10 – glufosinate-ammonium^Footnote 36

Corn volunteers that are tolerant to herbicides can be controlled using herbicides with other modes of action or by mechanical means.

4.5.3 Integrated weed management

Integrated weed management (IWM) utilizes a combination of biological, cultural, mechanical, and chemical weed control tactics to manage weed populations and increase economic returns. IWM strategies for volunteer corn can include

the rotation of crops
rotation of herbicide groups
planting into weed-free seedbeds
pre-plant cultivation
inter-row cultivation
pre-plant/pre-emergence/post-emergence herbicides^Footnote 1 ^{Footnote 117}

4.5.4 Biological control

No biological control methods for corn volunteers exist.

4.6 Means of movement and dispersal

Human intervention is required to disperse seeds due to the seeds being enclosed within a protective husk. Seed may be distributed along pathways of travel from field operation to storage facilities during harvesting^Footnote 44 ^{Footnote 113}. Deer, birds, and raccoons feed on corn crops; however, there is no evidence of significant dispersal by these animals^Footnote 2.

5. Related species of Zea mays

Wild relatives of corn are known as teosintes and include wild taxa from the 5 species in the genus Zea^{Footnote 136}. Corn is sexually compatible with other teosintes and can produce fertile hybrids^{Footnote 113} ^{Footnote 163}. Of the Zea species, only corn is common to Canada and is present only as an agricultural crop^Footnote 1 ^Footnote 2 ^Footnote 20. Teosinte species are geographically restricted and occur only in México, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua^{Footnote 136}.

The closest relative of the genus Zea is Tripsacum, a genus of 11 species widely distributed between latitudes 42 degrees north and 24 degrees south^Footnote 46. The species Tripsacum latifolium and Tripsacum fasciculaum are present in Puerto Rico^{Footnote 153}. 3 species occur in the continental United States, namely

Tripsacum floridanum (Florida gamagrass)
Tripsacum lanceolatum (Mexican gamagrass)
Tripsacum dactyloides (Eastern gamagrass)

T. floridanum is confined to Florida and T. lanceolatum is confined to the southern parts of Arizona and New Mexico^{Footnote 153}. Tripsacum dactyloides possesses a wide distribution across the eastern United States that includes Michigan and New York^{Footnote 153}, but it has not been reported in Canada^Footnote 20 ^Footnote 22.

5.1 Inter-species/genus hybridization

Crosses between corn and closely related genera are possible but extremely difficult^{Footnote 105}. Previous research has shown that corn can be crossed with Tripsacum species (T. dactyloides, T. floridanum, T. lanceolatum and T. pilosum); however, only through human intervention and with resulting hybrids possessing a high degree of sterility and genetic instability^Footnote 56 ^Footnote 89 ^{Footnote 113}. There is no evidence that hybridization occurs naturally. The first successful hybridization of corn and Tripsacum species was reported in the early 1900s with corn as the female parent^{Footnote 104}. The crossing of 2 relatives of corn Tripsacum dactyloides and Zea diploperennis is possible using a controlled standard pollination technique, with Z. diploperennis as the male parent and T. dactyloides as the female parent. Artificial culture techniques were used to germinate hybrid seeds^Footnote 55 ^Footnote 58. These hybrids were bred for resistance to disease and other pests, drought tolerance, and improved uniformity^Footnote 55 ^Footnote 56.

Hybridization between corn and other species of the Poaeceae family can only be achieved with human intervention^Footnote 77. There are no reports of corn hybridizing naturally with other species of the Poaeceae family. About 6% of crosses between corn and Coix lachryma-jobi produced hybrid seed, only when C. lachryma-jobi was the female parent^Footnote 96. Corn has also been crossed with hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum); however, endosperm did not form on the embryo^Footnote 98 ^{Footnote 167}. Corn has been crossed with hexaploid oat (Avena sativa), with hybrid plants only surviving following embryo rescue^Footnote 96. Crosses have also occurred with barley (Hordeum vulgare) and rye (Secale cereal) with corn as pollen donor; however, no embryos developed in the case of the H. vulgare × corn, and all S. cereal × corn embryos degenerated after 6 to 10 days due to lack of endosperm development^{Footnote 166}.

5.2 Potential for introgression of genetic information from Zea mays into relatives

Relatives of corn do not occur in Canada, although Tripsacum dactyloides is widespread across the eastern United States and found in counties close to Canada, including Niagara county in the state of New York and Macomb and Washtenaw counties in the state of Michigan^{Footnote 153}. T. dactyloides is extremely unlikely to form fertile hybrids with cultivated corn. All teosintes, including Zea mays ssp. mexicana and parviglumis, occur only in México, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua^{Footnote 136}.

In the absence of sexually compatible species related to corn in Canada, there is no potential for interspecific gene flow.

5.3 Summary of the ecology of relatives of Zea mays

Relatives of corn do not occur in Canada. T. dactyloides is widespread across the eastern United States; however, it is extremely unlikely to form fertile hybrids with cultivated corn^{Footnote 153}. T. dactyloides is not regarded as a noxious weed and is considered an endangered species in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, a threatened species in New York, and a species of special concern in Rhode Island^{Footnote 153}.

6. Potential interaction of Zea mays with other life forms

The interactions of corn with other life forms in Canada are well characterized, and information is readily available on the management of many diseases and pests of corn.

Corn can host numerous pathogenic species that cause disease and decrease crop yield and quality^{Footnote 125}. The most common diseases of corn in Canada include^Footnote 1:

anthracnose leaf blight and stalk rot (Colletotrichum graminicola)
common rust (Puccinia sorghi)
common smut (Ustilago maydis)
Gibberella ear rot (Gibberella zeae)
Northern corn leaf blight (Exserohilum turcicum)
seed rots and seedling blights (Pythium, Fusarium spp., Diplodia spp., Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp., and Rhizoconia spp.)
stalk rots (Gibberella zeae, Fusarium and Diplodia maydis)

The European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) was considered one of the most destructive insect pests of corn in Canada. However, widespread planting of Bt corn has been attributed to the area-wide suppression of European corn borer, causing its status as a primary pest to be questioned^{Footnote 143}. European corn borer is currently distributed in the southern parts of Canada from the Prairie provinces to the Maritimes. Corn rootworm is another important pest of corn in Canada, namely the western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) and the northern corn rootworm (Diabrotica barberi). These species feed on corn in the adult and larval stages of development and can be found in Ontario, Quebec, parts of the Atlantic provinces, British Columbia, and Manitoba^Footnote 11 ^Footnote 62 ^Footnote 85. Another insect pest of corn, western bean cutworm (Striacosta albicosta), was first detected in Ontario in 2008^Footnote 12 following a range expansion over the past century from its native locality in the southwest United States. The damage caused by larval feeding on tassel tissue and the corn ear reduces grain quality and leaves the ear susceptible to ear mold fungi which may produce harmful mycotoxins^{Footnote 123}. Other major insect pests including seed corn maggot (Delia platura), corn earworm (Heliothis zea), and several species of wireworms (Elateridae) are discussed in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada's (AAFC) Crop Profile for Field Corn in Canada.

Please refer to the tables below for examples of interactions of Zea mays with other life forms during its life cycle:

Table 1: Fungi
Table 2: Bacteria
Table 3: Viruses
Table 4: Insects
Table 5: Nematodes
Table 6: Plants
Table 7: Animals

Abbreviation list for tables

BC – British Columbia
AB – Alberta
SK – Saskatchewan
MB – Manitoba
ON – Ontario
QC – Quebec
NB – New Brunswick
NS – Nova Scotia
PE- Prince Edward Island
NL – Newfoundland & Labrador

Table 1: Fungi
Fungi	Interaction with Zea mays (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer)	Presence in Canada(s)	Reference(s)
Aspergillus flavus Link (Aspergillus ear rots)	Pathogen	MB, ON and QC	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64)
Bipolaris maydis (Y. Nisik. & C. Miyake) Shoemaker (Maydis leaf blight)	Pathogen	ON, QC and PEI	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64)
Botryodiplodia theobromae Pat. (Botryodiplodia stalk rot)	Pathogen	AB, MB and QC	(CABI and EPPO 2010^Footnote 27)
Cercospora zeae-maydis Tehon & E.Y. Daniels (Cercospora leaf spot)	Pathogen	ON	(Zhu et al. 2002^{Footnote 171}; Seed Corn Growers of Ontario 2006^{Footnote 138})
Cladosporium cladosporioides (Fresen.) G.A. de Vries (Cladosporium ear rot)	Pathogen	BC, MB and ON	(Conners 1967^Footnote 43; Ginns 1986^Footnote 64)
Cladosporium herbarum (Pers.) Link (Cladosporium ear rot)	Pathogen	BC, ON and QC	(Conners 1967^Footnote 43; Zhu et al. 2001^{Footnote 170})
Colletotrichum graminicola (Ces.) G.W. Wils. (Anthracnose stalk rot and leaf blight)	Pathogen	ON and QC	(Zhu et al. 2006^{Footnote 172})
Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) KJ. Leonard & Suggs (Northern corn leaf blight)	Pathogen	MB, ON and QC	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64)
Fusarium spp. (Fusarium seedling blight, root, stalk, and kernel rot)	Pathogen	Widespread Note: Many species of Fusarium are recorded from Canada	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64) Bourdages et al. 2006^Footnote 19; Gordon 2011^Footnote 67, Canadian Grain Commission 2019^Footnote 30)
Gibberella zeae (Schw.) Petch (Gibberella stalk and ear rot)	Pathogen	AB, SK, MB, ON, QC, NS and PEI	(CABI and EPPO 1998^Footnote 23; Gourley 1983^Footnote 69; Turkington et al. 2011^{Footnote 150})
Kabatiella zeae Narita & Y. Hirats. (Eyespot of maize)	Pathogen	MB, ON and QC	(Boland et al. 2004^Footnote 15; Chang et al. 1990^Footnote 38; Desjardins et al. 2007^Footnote 48)
Nigrospora oryzae (Nigrospora ear rot)	Pathogen	SK, MB, ON and NS	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64; Gourley 1983^Footnote 69)
Penicillium spp. (Penicillium ear rot)	Pathogen	BC, AB, MB, ON and QC	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64; Howard et al. 1994^Footnote 82; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Peyronellaea maydis (Arny & R.R. Nelson) Crous (Phyllosticta leaf spot)	Pathogen	MB and ON	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64; Zhu et al. 2006^{Footnote 172}; Desjardins et al. 2007^Footnote 48)
Physoderma maydis (Miyabe) Miyabe (Brown spot)	Pathogen	ON	(Zhu et al. 2000^{Footnote 169})
Puccinia polysora Underw. (Southern rust)	Pathogen	ON	(Zhu et al. 2007^{Footnote 173}; Seed Corn Growers of Ontario 2006^{Footnote 138})
Puccinia sorghi Schwein. (Leaf rust)	Pathogen	Widespread	(Conners 1938^Footnote 42; Parmelee and Savile 1986^{Footnote 124}; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Pythium spp. (Pythium seedling blight and root rot)	Pathogen	Widespread	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Rhizoctonia spp. (Rhizoctonia seedling blight and root rot)	Pathogen	AB, SK, MB, ON, QC and PEI	(Desjardins et al. 2007^Footnote 48; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Sclerophthora macrospora (Sacc.) Thirum., C.G. Shaw & Naras. (Downy mildew)	Pathogen	SK, MB and ON	(Desjardins et al. 2007^Footnote 48; Ginns 1986^Footnote 64; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Setosphaeria turcica (Luttr.) K.J. Leonard & Suggs (Northern corn leaf blight)	Pathogen	MB, ON and QC	(CABI and EPPO 2008^Footnote 25)
Sphacelotheca reiliana (J.G. Kühn) G.P. Clinton (Head smut)	Pathogen	BC, MB, ON and QC	(Elmhirst and Joshi 1996^Footnote 53; Government of Manitoba 2016^Footnote 70; Norman et al. 1995^{Footnote 112}; Zhu et al. 2007^{Footnote 173})
Stenocarpella maydis (Diploidia ear rot)	Pathogen	BC and ON	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64)
Ustilago maydis (DC.) Corda (Corn smut)	Pathogen	Widespread	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64)

Table 2: Bacteria
Bacteria	Interaction with Zea mays (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer)	Presence in Canada	Reference(s)
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis (Vidaver and Mandel) Davis (Goss's bacterial wilt and blight)	Pathogen	AB and MB	(Zhu et al. 2000^{Footnote 169}; Howard et al. 2015^Footnote 84)
Erwinia carotovora f. sp. carotovora (Jones) Bergey et al. (Erwinia stalk rot)	Pathogen	BC, AB, ON and PEI	(Holley and Calpas 1994^Footnote 83; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii (Smith) Mergaert et al. (Stewart's wilt)	Pathogen	BC, AB, ON and QC	(CABI and EPPO 2009^Footnote 26; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Pseudomonas syringae Van Hall (Holcus spot)	Pathogen	AB, SK, MB, ON and QC	(Ginns 1986^Footnote 64; Zhu et al. 2001^{Footnote 170})

Table 3: Viruses
Viruses	Interaction with Zea mays (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer)	Presence in Canada	Reference(s)
Maize dwarf mosaic (MDMV)	Pathogen	ON	(Zhu et al. 2001^{Footnote 170}; CABI and EPPO 2003^Footnote 24)

Table 4: Insects
Insects	Interaction with Zea mays (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer)	Presence in Canada	Reference(s)
Amphimallon majale (Razoumowsky) (European chafer)	Consumer	BC, ON, QC and NB	(Bousquet et al. 2013^Footnote 18)
Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel) (Black cutworm)	Consumer	Widespread	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Chaetocnema pulicaria Melsheimer (Corn flea beetle)	Consumer	ON and QC	(Jean and Boisclair 2001^Footnote 92; OMAFRA 2017b^{Footnote 117})
Delia platura (Meigen) (Seedcorn maggot)	Consumer	Widespread	(Hill 2008^Footnote 80; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Diabrotica barberi Smith & Lawrence (Northern corn rootworm)	Consumer	MB, ON, QC and NB	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Diabrotica cristata (Harris)	Consumer	ON	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Western corn rootworm)	Consumer	BC, ON and QC	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21, ^Footnote 85)
Elaterid spp. (Wireworm)	Consumer	Widespread	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Heliothis zea (Corn earworm)	Consumer	Widespread	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Hydraecia micacea (Esper) (Potato stem borer)	Consumer	ON to NL	(Bartlett 2012^Footnote 10; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Mythimna unipuncta (Haworth) (Armyworm)	Consumer	MB, ON and QC	(CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Nitidulid spp. (Sap beetles)	Consumer	Widespread	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (European corn borer)	Consumer	Widespread	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Papaipema nebris (Guenée) (Stalk borer)	Consumer	QC and NB	(Decker 1931^Footnote 47)
Popillia japonica Newman (Japanese beetle)	Consumer	ON, QC, PEI and NS	(Bousquet et al. 2013^Footnote 18; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch) (Corn leaf aphid)	Consumer	Widespread	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Striacosta albicosta (Smith) (Western bean cutworm)	Consumer	AB, ON and QC	(Smith et al. 2018^{Footnote 143})
Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Fall armyworm)	Consumer	MB, ON, QC, NB, PEI and NS	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Scarabaeidae spp. (June beetle)	Consumer	Widespread	(CABI 2016^Footnote 21)
Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Angoumois grain moth)	Consumer	ON	(Canadian Grain Commission 2009^Footnote 29)
Melanoplus spp. (Grasshoppers)	Consumer	Some species restricted to certain areas of Canada, others, like M. borealis, extremely widespread.	(Vickery and Kevan 1986^{Footnote 154})
Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Indian meal moth)	Consumer	Widespread, though not well established due to cold climate. Indoor pest.	(Canadian Grain Commission 2009^Footnote 29)
Sitophilus granarius L. (Grain weevil)	Consumer	BC, AB, SK, MB and ON	(Canadian Grain Commission 2009^Footnote 29)
Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Grain weevil)	Consumer	ON and QC	(Canadian Grain Commission 2009^Footnote 29)
Family Anthocoridae, insidious flower bugs	Beneficial organism	Widespread	(Jasinski et al. 2009^Footnote 91)
Euschistus servus (Say) (Stink bug)	Beneficial organism	BC to QC, and NS	(Maw et al. 2000^{Footnote 108})
Family Chrysopidae, Green lacewings	Beneficial organism	Widespread	(Jasinski et al. 2009^Footnote 91)
Family Coccinellidae lady beetles	Beneficial organism	Widespread	(Smith et al. 2019^{Footnote 142})
Family Hemerobiidae, brown lacewings	Beneficial organism	Widespread	(Jasinski et al. 2009^Footnote 91)
Family Nabidae, damsel bugs	Beneficial organism	Widespread	(Jasinski et al. 2009^Footnote 91)
Family Syrphidae, hover flies	Beneficial organism	Widespread	(Jasinski et al. 2009^Footnote 91)

Table 5: Nematodes
Nematodes	Interaction with Zea mays (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer)	Presence in Canada	Reference(s)
Aphelenchoides composticola Franklin	Consumer	PEI	(Kimpinski et al. 1977^Footnote 94)
Aphelenchoides saprophilus Franklin	Consumer	PEI	(Kimpinski et al. 1977^Footnote 94)
Ditylenchus spp.	Consumer	AB and PEI	(Hawn 1973^Footnote 78; Kimpinski et al. 1977^Footnote 94)
Helicotylenchus spp.	Consumer	Widespread. Various species present – BC, MB, ON, QC, PEI and NS	(Kimpinski et al. 1977^Footnote 94; Potter and Townshend 1973^{Footnote 133}; Vrain and Dupré 1982^{Footnote 155}; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Heterodera avenae Wollenweb.	Consumer	MB, ON and PEI	(Ebsary 1993^Footnote 52; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Longidorus spp. (Needle nematodes)	Consumer	BC, ON, QC and PEI	(Gilbert et al. 2003^Footnote 63; Walker 1966^{Footnote 156}; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Meloidogyne spp. (Root-knot nematodes)	Consumer	ON and PEI	(Kimpinski et al. 1977^Footnote 94; Olthof et al. 1967^{Footnote 114}; Vrain and Dupré 1982^{Footnote 155}; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Merlinius brevidens (Allen) Siddiqi	Consumer	ON	(Sewell 1972^{Footnote 139}; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Paratylenchus spp.	Consumer	Various species reported from AB, SK, MB, ON, QC and PEI	(Kimpinski et al. 1977^Footnote 94; Townshend and Potter 1976^{Footnote 149}; Vrain and Dupré 1982^{Footnote 155}; Wu and Townshend 1973^{Footnote 164}; CABI 2019^Footnote 22)
Pratylenchus brachyurus (Root-lesion nematodes)	Consumer	Various species reported from MB, ON, QC and PEI	(Ebsary 1993^Footnote 52; Kimpinski et al. 1977^Footnote 94; MacNay 1955^{Footnote 101}; Olthof et al. 1968^{Footnote 115}; Townshend and Potter 1976^{Footnote 149}; Vrain and Dupré 1982^{Footnote 155})
Tylenchorhynchus spp.	Consumer	Various species reported from BC, AB, ON, QC and PEI	(CABI 2019^Footnote 22; Kimpinski et al. 1977^Footnote 94; Potter and Townshend 1973^{Footnote 133}; Vrain and Dupré 1982^{Footnote 155})

Table 6: Plants
Plants	Interaction with Zea mays (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer)	Presence in Canada	Reference(s)
Tripsacum dactyloides (Eastern gamagrass)	Gene transfer	Absent	(OECD 2003^{Footnote 113}; USDA-NRCS 2016^{Footnote 153}; Wilkes 1977^{Footnote 163})
Tripsacum floridanum (Florida gamagrass)	Gene transfer	Absent	(OECD 2003^{Footnote 113}; USDA-NRCS 2016^{Footnote 153}; Wilkes 1977^{Footnote 163})
Tripsacum lanceolatum (Mexican gamagrass)	Gene transfer	Absent	(OECD 2003^{Footnote 113}; USDA-NRCS 2016^{Footnote 153}; Wilkes 1977^{Footnote 163})

Table 7: Animals
Animals	Interaction with Zea mays (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer)	Presence in Canada	Reference(s)
Birds (for example crows)	Consumer	Widespread	(AAFC 2014^Footnote 2)
Animal browsers (such as deer, raccoon)	Consumer, Beneficial organism	Widespread	(AAFC 2014^Footnote 2)
Slugs	Consumer	Widespread	(AAFC 2014^Footnote 2)

7. References

Reference 1

AAFC. 2006. Crop profile for field corn in Canada – PDF (561 kb). [Online] [March 15, 2019].

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Reference 2

AAFC. 2014. Crop profile for sweet corn in Canada. [Online] [March 15, 2019].

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Reference 3

AAFC. 2015. Crop variety registration in canada: Issues and options - PDF (779 kb). [Online] [March 2, 2017].

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Reference 4

Anderson, P. C. and Georgeson, M. 1989. Herbicide-tolerant mutants of corn. Genome 31(2):994-999.

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Reference 5

Ashworth, A.J., Allen, F.L., Saxton, A.M., and Tyler, D.D. 2016. Long-term corn yield impacted by cropping rotations and biocovers under no-tillage Agronomy Journal 108(4):1495-1502.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Reference 6

Australian Government. 2008. The biology of Zea mays spp mays (maize or corn). [Online] [April 10, 2019].

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Reference 7

Aylor, D.E. 2003. Rate of dehydration of corn (Zea mays) pollen in the air. Journal of Experimental Biology 54(391):2307-2312.

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Reference 8

Aylor, D. E. 2004. Survival of maize (Zea mays) pollen exposed in the atmosphere. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 123(3-4):125-133.

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Reference 9

Bannert, M. and Stamp, P. 2007. Cross-pollination of maize at long distance. European Journal of Agronomy 27(1):44-51.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Reference 10

Bartlett, T. 2012. Net: Identification, images, & information for insects, spiders & their kin for the United States & Canada. [Online] [December 15, 2016].

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Reference 11

Baute, T. 2004. A grower's handbook: Controlling corn insects pests with bt corn technology. Second Edition. Canadian Corn Pest Coalition, Ridgetown, Ontario. 24 pp.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Reference 12

Baute, T., and J. Bruggeman. 2011. Western bean cutworm 2010 trap network results. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs.

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Reference 13

Birch, C.J., Stephen, K., McLean, G., Doherty, A., Hammer, G.L., and Robertson, M.J. 2008. Reliability of production of quick to medium maturity maize in areas of variable rainfall in north-east Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48:326-334.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Reference 14

Blacklow, W.M. 1972. Influence of temperature on germination and elongation of the radicle and shoot of corn (Zea mays). Crop Science 12:646-650.

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Reference 15

Boland, G., Melzer, M., Hopkin, A., Higgins, V. and Nassuth, A. 2004. Climate change and plant diseases in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 26(3):335-350.

Return to footnote 15 referrer

Reference 16

Bolaños, J., and Edmeades, G. O. 1996. The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Field Crops Research 48:65-

Return to footnote 16 referrer

Reference 17

Bonhomme, R.M. Derieux, M., and Edmeades, G.O. 1994. Flowering of diverse maize cultivars in relation to temperature and photoperiod in multilocation field trials. Crop Science 34:156-164.

Return to footnote 17 referrer

Reference 18

Bousquet, Y., Bouchard, P., Davies, A. E. and Sikes, D. S. 2013. Checklist of beetles (Coleoptera) of Canada and Alaska. 2nd ed. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Return to footnote 18 referrer

Reference 19

Bourdages, J.V. Marchand, S., Belzile F.J., and Rioux, S. 2006. Diversity and prevalence of Fusarium species from Quebec barley fields. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 28(3):419-425.

Return to footnote 19 referrer

Reference 20

Brouillet, L., Coursol, F., Meades, S. J., Favreau, M., Anions, M., Bélisle, P. and Desmet, P. 2010+. VASCAN, the database of vascular plants of Canada. [Online] [2014].

Return to footnote 20 referrer

Reference 21

CABI. 2016. Crop protection compendium. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

Return to footnote 21 referrer

Reference 22

CABI. 2019. Invasive Species Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.

Return to footnote 22 referrer

Reference 23

CABI and EPPO. 1998. Gibberella zeae [Distribution map] Map no. 763. Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases.

Return to footnote 23 referrer

Reference 24

CABI and EPPO. 2003. Maize dwarf mosaic (MDMV) [Distribution map] Map no. 899. Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases.

Return to footnote 24 referrer

Reference 25

CABI and EPPO. 2008. Setosphaeria turcica [Distribution map] Map no. 257. Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases.

Return to footnote 25 referrer

Reference 26

CABI and EPPO. 2009. Pantoea stewartii [Distribution map] Map no. 41 Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases.

Return to footnote 26 referrer

Reference 27

CABI and EPPO. 2010. Lasiodiplodia theobromae [Distribution map] Map no. 561 Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases.

Return to footnote 27 referrer

Reference 28

Canadian Corn Pest Coalition. 2019. Bt Corn Products/Traits Available in Canada. [Online] [March 14, 2019].

Return to footnote 28 referrer

Reference 29

Canadian Grain Commission. 2009. [August 1, 2019]

Return to footnote 29 referrer

Reference 30

Canadian Grain Commission. 2019. Fusarium head blight in western Canada. [Online]

Return to footnote 30 referrer

Reference 31

Canadian Seed Growers' Association. 2019. Canadian Regulations and Procedures for Pedigreed Seed Crop Production Manual (Circular 6).

Return to footnote 31 referrer

Reference 32

Carcova, J., M. Uribelarrea, L. Borra's, M.E. Otegui, and Westgate M.E. 2000. Synchronous pollination within and between ears improves kernel set in maize. Crop Science 40:1056–1061

Return to footnote 32 referrer

Reference 33

CFIA. 1996. Decision Document DD1996-09: Determination of Environmental Safety of Event 176 Bt Corn (Zea mays L.) Developed by Ciba Seeds and Mycogen Corporation. [Online] [March 14, 2019].

Return to footnote 33 referrer

Reference 34

CFIA. 2003. Decision Document DD2003-43: Determination of the safety of Monsanto Canada Inc.'s insect resistant corn (Zea mays L.) line MON 863. [Online] [March 1, 2017].

Return to footnote 34 referrer

Reference 35

CFIA. 2015. Decision Document DD2015-111 Determination of the Safety of Monsanto Canada Inc.'s Corn (Zea mays L.) Event MON 87411. [Online]

Return to footnote 35 referrer

Reference 36

CFIA. 2020. Plants with novel traits (PNT) and novel feeds from plant sources approved in Canada. Corn (Zea Mays L.). [Online]

Return to footnote 36 referrer

Reference 37

Chahal, P. 2014. Control of herbicide-resistant volunteer corn in herbicide-resistant soybean. MSc. Agronomy. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nebraska. 118 pp.

Return to footnote 37 referrer

Reference 38

Chang, M., Hudon, M. and Devaux, A. 1990. Inheritance of resistance to Kabatielle eyespot of maize. Phytoprotection 71(3):107-112.

Return to footnote 38 referrer

Reference 39

Coe, E. H., Neuffer, M. G. and Hoisington, D. A. 1988. The genetics of corn. Pages 81–257 in F. Sprague, J. W. Dudley, eds. Corn and Corn Improvement (Third Edition), Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Return to footnote 39 referrer

Reference 40

Colless, J.M. 1992. Maize growing. Report No. P3.3.3 – Agdex 111, 2nd edition, NSW Agriculture Grafton.

Return to footnote 40 referrer

Reference 41

Colasanti J. and Muszynski, M. 2009. The maize floral transition. In: Bennetzen JL, (eds) Handbook of Maize: Its Biology, Springer, New York, USA, pp 41-55.

Return to footnote 41 referrer

Reference 42

Conners, I. L. 1938. Diseases of vegetables and field crops. Pages 27-70 Eighteenth Annual Report of the Canadian Plant Disease Survey.

Return to footnote 42 referrer

Reference 43

Conners, I. L. 1967. An annotated index of plant diseases in Canada, and fungi recorded on plants in Alaska, Canada and Greenland. Canada. Department of Agriculture. Publication, 1251. 381 pp.

Return to footnote 43 referrer

Reference 44

Cook, B. G., Pengelly, B. C., Brown, S. D., Donnelly, J. L., Eagles, D. A., Franco, M. A., Hanson, J., Mullen, B. F., Partrighe, I. J., Peters, M. and others. 2005. Tropical Forages: an interactive selection tool. Web Tool. [Online] [December 5, 2016].

Return to footnote 44 referrer

Reference 45

Crookston, R.K., Kurle, J.E., Copeland, P.J., Ford, J.H., and Lueschen, W.E. 1991. Rotational cropping sequence affects yield of corn and soybean. Agronomy Journal 83:108-113.

Return to footnote 45 referrer

Reference 46

De Wet, J., Timothy, D., Hilu, K. and Fletcher, G. 1981. Systematics of South American Tripsacum (Gramineae). American Journal of Botany 68(2):269-276.

Return to footnote 46 referrer

Reference 47

Decker, G. C. 1931. The biology of the stalk borer Papainema nebris (Gn.). Pages 289-351 Research Bulletin, Agricultural Experiment Station, Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, Ames, Iowa.

Return to footnote 47 referrer

Reference 48

Desjardins, M., Heard, J., Kaminski, D. and Northover, P. 2007. 2006 Manitoba Crop Diagnostic Centre laboratory submissions. Canadian Plant Disease Survey.

Return to footnote 48 referrer

Reference 49

Doebley, J., Wendel, J.D., Smith, J.S.C., Stuber, C.W., and Goodman, M.M. 1988. The origin of cornbelt maize: the isozyme evidence. Economic Botany 42(1): 120-131

Return to footnote 49 referrer

Reference 50

Doebley, J. 2004. The genetics of maize evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 38:37-59.

Return to footnote 50 referrer

Reference 51

Dunlop, G. 2015. Bt corn IRM compliance in Canada. [Online] [April 10, 2019].

Return to footnote 51 referrer

Reference 52

Ebsary, B. A. 1993. Centre for Plant Quarantine Pests, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in Canada. Pages 45. Unpublished, Nepean, Ontario.

Return to footnote 52 referrer

Reference 53

Elmhirst, J. F. and Joshi, V. 1996. Diseases diagnosed on commercial crops submitted to the British Columbia Plant Diagnostic Laboratory in 1995. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 76(1):31-41.

Return to footnote 53 referrer

Reference 54

Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of seed plants. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 576 pp.

Return to footnote 54 referrer

Reference 55

Eubanks, M. 1995. A cross between two maize relatives: Tripsacum dactyloides and Zea diploperennis (Poaceae). Economic Botany 49(2):172-182.

Return to footnote 55 referrer

Reference 56

Eubanks, M. W. 1998. Method and materials for conferring tripsacum genes in maize. Google Patents.

Return to footnote 56 referrer

Reference 57

2017. Food and agricultural commodities production. [Online].

Return to footnote 57 referrer

Reference 58

Farquharson, L.I. 1957. Hybridization of Tripsacum and Zea. Journal of Heredity. 48:295–299.

Return to footnote 58 referrer

Reference 59

Gassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., Keweshan, R. S. and Dunbar, M. W. 2011. Field-evolved resistance to Bt maize by western corn rootworm. PLoS One 6(7):e22629.

Return to footnote 59 referrer

Reference 60

Gassmann, A. J., Petzold-Maxwell, J. L., Clifton, E. H., Dunbar, M. W., Hoffmann, A. M., Ingber, D. A. and Keweshan, R. S. 2014. Field-evolved resistance by western corn rootworm to multiple Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in transgenic maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(14):5141-5146.

Return to footnote 60 referrer

Reference 61

Gassmann, A. J., Shrestha, R. B., Jakka, S. R., Dunbar, M. W., Clifton, E. H., Paolino, A. R., Ingber, D. A., French, B. W., Masloski, K. E. and Dounda, J. W. 2016. Evidence of resistance to Cry34/35Ab1 corn by western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): root injury in the field and larval survival in plant-based bioassays. Journal of economic entomology 109(4):1872-1880.

Return to footnote 61 referrer

Reference 62

Gavloski, J. and Bajracharya, P. 2016. Manitoba insect & Disease update. [Online] [March 15, 2019].

Return to footnote 62 referrer

Reference 63

Gilbert, G., Hamel, D. and Lacroix, M. 2003. Diseases diagnosed on commercial crops submitted to the MAPAQ diagnostic laboratory in 2002. Canadian Plant Disease Survey.

Return to footnote 63 referrer

Reference 64

Ginns, J. H. 1986. Compendium of plant disease and decay fungi in Canada, 1960-1980. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa.

Return to footnote 64 referrer

Reference 65

Gonzalez, J. and Corral, J. 1997. Teosinte distribution in Mexico. Proc. Gene flow among maize landraces, improved maize varieties, and teosinte: Implications for transgenic maize Serratos, JA, Willcox, MC, and Castillo, F (eds) INIFAP, CIMMYT and CNBA, Mexico.

Return to footnote 65 referrer

Reference 66

Goodman, M. M. and Galinat, W. C. 1988. The history and evolution of maize. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 7(3):197-220.

Return to footnote 66 referrer

Reference 67

Gordon, W.L. 2011. The occurrence of Fusarium species in Canada. I. Species of Fusarium isolated from farm samples of cereal seed in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 22(6):282:286.

Return to footnote 67 referrer

Reference 68

Gould, F. 1968. Grass systematics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Return to footnote 68 referrer

Reference 69

Gourley, C. O. 1983. An annotated index of the fungi of Nova Scotia. Proceedings of the Nova Scotia Institute of Science 32(2/3):75-294.

Return to footnote 69 referrer

Reference 70

Government of Manitoba. 2016. Disease and disorders of corn. [Online] [August 19, 2016].

Return to footnote 70 referrer

Reference 71

Government of Canada. 2016. Weed Seeds Order 2016. [Online]

Return to footnote 71 referrer

Reference 72

Gray, M. E. 2010. Relevance of traditional integrated pest management (IPM) strategies for commercial corn producers in a transgenic agroecosystem: A bygone era? Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59(11):5852-5858.

Return to footnote 72 referrer

Reference 73

Hall, A.J., Lemcoff, J., and Trapani, N. 1981. Water stress before and during flowering in maize and its effects on yield, its components,and their determinants. Maydica 26:19–38.

Return to footnote 73 referrer

Reference 74

Hallauer, A.R., Russell, W.A., and Lamkey, K.R. 1988. Corn breeding. Corn and Corn Improvement 18:463-564.

Return to footnote 74 referrer

Reference 75

Hallauer, A. R. and Carena, M. J. 2009. Pages 3-98 Cereals. Springer, New York, NY.

Return to footnote 75 referrer

Reference 76

Halsey, M. E., Remund, K. M., Davis, C. A., Qualls, M., Eppard, P. J. and Berberich, S. A. 2005. Isolation of maize from pollen-mediated gene flow by time and distance. Crop Science 45(6):2172-2185.

Return to footnote 76 referrer

Reference 77

Harada, K., Murakami, M., Fukushima, A. 1954. Breeding study on the forage crops : studies on the intergeneric hybridization between the genus Zea and Coix (Maydeae). I. The Scientific Reports of the Saikyo University Agriculture, Kyoto, Japan. 6:139-145.

Return to footnote 77 referrer

Reference 78

Hawn, E. J. 1973. Plant-parastic nematodes in irrigated soils of Alberta. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 53(1):29-30.

Return to footnote 78 referrer

Reference 79

Health Canada. 2019. Search Product Label. [Online] [September 23, 2019].

Return to footnote 79 referrer

Reference 80

Hill, D. S. 2008. Pests of crops in warmer climates and their control. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht. 716 pp.

Return to footnote 80 referrer

Reference 81

Hitchcock, A. S. 1971. Manual of the grasses of the United States. Courier Corporation, US Department of Agriculture.

Return to footnote 81 referrer

Reference 82

Holley, J. and Calpas, J. 1994. Diseases diagnosed on vegetable crops submitted to the Southern Alberta Regional Crop Laboratory and Brooks Diagnostics Limited in 1993. Canadian Plant Disease Survey.

Return to footnote 82 referrer

Reference 83

Howard, R., Briant, M. and Sims, S. 1994. Seedling diseases of corn in southern Alberta in 1993. Canadian Plant Disease Survey.

Return to footnote 83 referrer

Reference 84

Howard, R. J., et al. 2015. First report of Goss's bacterial wilt and leaf blight on corn caused by Clavibacter michiganensis nebraskensis in Alberta, Canada. Plant Disease 99.1034: 10-1094.

Return to footnote 84 referrer

Reference 85

Hueppelsheuser, T. 2018. British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Western corn rootworm – PDF (941 kb). [Online] [April 10, 2019].

Return to footnote 85 referrer

Reference 86

Imholte, A.A., and Carter, P.R. 1987. Planting date and tillage effects on corn following corn. Agronomy Journal 79(4):746-751.

Return to footnote 86 referrer

Reference 87

2016. Retrieved [June 17 2016], from the Integrated Taxonomic Information System on-line database.

Return to footnote 87 referrer

Reference 88

Jackson, S.D. 2009. Plant responses to photoperiod. The New Phytologist 181:517–531.

Return to footnote 88 referrer

Reference 89

James, J. 1979. New maize x Tripsacum hybrids for maize improvement. Euphytica 28(2):239-247.

Return to footnote 89 referrer

Reference 90

Jarosz, N., Loubet, B., Durand, B., McCartney, A., Foueillassar, X. and Huber, L. 2003. Field measurements of airborne concentration and deposition rate of maize pollen. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 119(1-2):37-51.

Return to footnote 90 referrer

Reference 91

Jasinski, J., Precheur, R., Welty, C., Curtis, P., Robinson, D. G., Pataky, K., Weinzierl, R., Becker, R., Fritz, V. and Orzolek, M. 2009. Sweet corn pest identification and management. The Great Lakes Vegetable Working Group and North Central Integrated Pest Management Center, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.

Return to footnote 91 referrer

Reference 92

Jean, C. and Boisclair, J. 2001. Ravageurs et maladies du maïs sucré : Manuel de l'observateur. Institut de recherche et développement en agroenvironnement (IRDA), Sainte-Foy, Québec. 95 pp.

Return to footnote 92 referrer

Reference 93

Kiesselbach, T.A. 1949. The structure and reproduction of corn. Research bulletin: Bulletin of the Agricultural Experiment Station of Nebraska No. 161

Return to footnote 93 referrer

Reference 94

Kimpinski, J., Thompson, L. S., White, R. P. and Willis, C. B. 1977. Nematodes in field corn in Prince Edward Island. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 57(2):323-330.

Return to footnote 94 referrer

Reference 95

Kwabiah, A.B. 2003. Performance of silage corn (Zea mays in a cool climate ecosystem: effects of photodgradable plastic mulch. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 83:305-312.

Return to footnote 95 referrer

Reference 96

Kynast, R. G., Riera-Lizarazu, O., Vales, M. I., Okagaki, R. J., Maquieria, S. B., Chen, G., Ananiev, E. V., Odland, W. E., Russell, C. D., Stec, A. O. and others. 2001. A complete set of maize individual chromosome additions to the oat genome. Plant Physiology 125:1216-1227.

Return to footnote 96 referrer

Reference 97

Langhof, M., Hommel, B., Hüsken, A., Schiemann, J., Wehling, P., Wilhelm, R. and Rühl, G. 2008. Coexistence in maize: Do nonmaize buffer zones reduce gene flow between maize fields? Crop Science 48(1):305-316.

Return to footnote 97 referrer

Reference 98

Laurie, D. A. and Bennett, M. D. 1988. The production of haploid wheat plants from wheat x maize crosses. Theoretical and Applied Sciences 76(3):393-397.

Return to footnote 98 referrer

Reference 99

Lee, E. and Tollenaar, M. 2007. Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yield. Crop Science 47(Supplement 3):202-215.

Return to footnote 99 referrer

Reference 100

Luna, V., Figueroa, M., Baltazar, M., Gomez, L., Townsend, R. and Schoper, J. 2001. Maize pollen longevity and distance isolation requirements for effective pollen control. Crop Science 41(5):1551-1557.

Return to footnote 100 referrer

Reference 101

MacNay, C. G. 1955. Plant-parasitic and soil-inhabiting nematodes. The Canadian Insect Pest Review 33:162-169.

Return to footnote 101 referrer

Reference 102

Mallarino, A.P. 2006. A long-term look at crop rotation effects on corn yield and response to nitrogen fertilization. Integrated Crop Management Conference – Iowa State University – PDF (267 kb). [Online]

Return to footnote 102 referrer

Reference 103

Major, D., Brown, D., Bootsma, A., Dupuis, G., Fairey, N., Grant, E., Green, D., Hamilton, R., Langille, J. and Sonmor, L. 1983. An evaluation of the corn heat unit system for the short-season growing regions across Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 63(1):121-130.

Return to footnote 103 referrer

Reference 104

Mangelsdorf, P. C. and Reeves, R. G. 1931. Hybridization of maize, Tripsacum and Euchlaena. Journal of Heredity 22: 329-343.

Return to footnote 104 referrer

Reference 105

Mangelsdorf, P. C. 1974. Corn: its origin, evolution and improvement. Cambridge: Mass., Harvard University Press 262 pp.

Return to footnote 105 referrer

Reference 106

Marquardt, P. T., Terry, R. M. and Johnson, W. G. 2013. The impact of volunteer corn on crop yields and insect resistance management strategies. Agronomy 3(2):488-496.

Return to footnote 106 referrer

Reference 107

Matsuoka, Y., Vigouroux, Y., Goodman, M. M., Sanchez, J., Buckler, E. and Doebley, J. 2002. A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(9):6080-6084.

Return to footnote 107 referrer

Reference 108

Maw, E., Foottit, R. G., Hamilton, K. G. A. and Scudder, G. G. E. 2000. Checklist of the Hemiptera of Canada and Alaska. NRC Research Press, Ottawa.

Return to footnote 108 referrer

Reference 109

McSteen P., Laudencia-Chingcuanco D., Colasanti J. 2000. A floret by any other name: control of meristem identity in maize. Trends in Plant Science 5:61–66.

Return to footnote 109 referrer

Reference 110

Nannas, N.J. and Dawe, R.K. 2015. Genetic and genomic toolbox of Zea mays. Genetics 199:655-669.

Return to footnote 110 referrer

Reference 111

Newhouse, K., Singh, B., Shaner, D. and Stidham, M. 1991. Mutations in corn (Zea mays ) conferring resistance to imidazolinone herbicides. Theoretical and Applied Sciences 83(1):65-70.

Return to footnote 111 referrer

Reference 112

Norman, M. J. T., Pearson, C. J. and Searle, P. 1995. The ecology of tropical food crops. Cambridge University Press.

Return to footnote 112 referrer

Reference 113

OECD. 2003. Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, No. 27: Consensus document on the biology of Zea mays subsp. mays (maize) – PDF (244 kb).

Return to footnote 113 referrer

Reference 114

Olthof, O. C. A., Townshend, J. L., Potter, J. W. and Francis, H. D. 1967. Plant-parasitic nematode genera associated with crops in Ontario in 1967. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 47(4):110-111.

Return to footnote 114 referrer

Reference 115

Olthof, T. H., Townshend, J. and Potter, J. 1968. Economically important plant parasitic nematodes in Ontario. Proceeding of the Entomological Society of Ontario 102:7-9.

Return to footnote 115 referrer

Reference 116

OMAFRA. 2017a. Publication 75, Guide to weed control (2016-2017).

Return to footnote 116 referrer

Reference 117

OMAFRA. 2017b. Publication 811, Agronomy guide for field crops. Queen's Printer, Toronto, Canada.

Return to footnote 117 referrer

Reference 118

OMAFRA. 2018. Publication 812, Field crop protection guide, 2018-2019, Corn section – PDF (313 kb).

Return to footnote 118 referrer

Reference 119

OMAFRA. 2019. Publication 75A. Guide to weed control: Field crops (2019). Queen's Printer, Toronto, Canada.

Return to footnote 119 referrer

Reference 120

OMAFRA. 2020. Publication 75A. Guide to weed control: Field crops (2020). Queen's Printer, Toronto, Canada.

Return to footnote 120 referrer

Reference 121

Ontario Corn Committee. 2016. Growing Ontario's corn. [Online] [March 8, 2017].

Return to footnote 121 referrer

Reference 122

Paliwal, R.L. 2000. Introduction to maize and its importance. Chapter 1. In: Tropical Maize: Improvement and Production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome. pp 1-3.

Return to footnote 122 referrer

Reference 123

Parker, N. S., Anderson, N. R., Richmond, D. S., Long, E. Y., Wise, K. A. and Krupke, C. H. 2017. Larval western bean cutworm feeding damage encourages the development of Gibberella ear rot on field corn. Pest management science 73(3):546-553.

Return to footnote 123 referrer

Reference 124

Parmelee, J. A. and Savile, D. B. O. 1986. Puccinia sorghi. Fungi Canadenses 302:1-3.

Return to footnote 124 referrer

Reference 125

Pechanova, O. and Pechan, T. 2015. Maize-pathogen interactions: An ongoing combat from a proteomics perspective. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16(12):28429-28448.

Return to footnote 125 referrer

Reference 126

Pedersen, P., and Lauer, J.G. 2002. Influence of rotation sequence on the optimum corn and soybean plant population. Agronomy Journal 94(5):968-974.

Return to footnote 126 referrer

Reference 127

Pegg, L. 1988. Pulling tassels: A history of seed corn in Ontario. Blenheim Publishers Limited, Blenheim, ON.

Return to footnote 127 referrer

Reference 128

Perez-Prat, E. and van Lookeren Campagne, M.M. 2002. Hybrid seed production and the challenge of propagating male-sterile plants. Trends in Plant Science 7(5):199-203.

Return to footnote 128 referrer

Reference 129

Piperno, D.R., Ranere, J.A., Holst, I., Iriarte, J., Dickau, R. 2009. Starch grain and phytolith evidence for early ninth millennium B.P. maize from the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(13):5019-5024.

Return to footnote 129 referrer

Reference 130

Pixley, K. and Banziger, M. 2001. Open-pollinated maize varieties: A backward step or valuable option for farmers? In D.K. Friesen and A.F.E. Palmer, eds. Integrated approaches to higher maize productivity in the new millennium: Proceedings of the seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference pp. 22–28.

Return to footnote 130 referrer

Reference 131

Poehlman, J.M. and Sechler, D.T. 1979. Breeding field crops. AVI Publishing Co, Missouri.

Return to footnote 131 referrer

Reference 132

Purseglove, J.W. 1972. Tropical Crops: Monocotyledons. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York.

Return to footnote 132 referrer

Reference 133

Potter, J. and Townshend, J. 1973. Distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in field crop soils of southwestern and central Ontario. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 53:39-48.

Return to footnote 133 referrer

Reference 134

Ranere, Anthony J., et al. 2009. The cultural and chronological context of early Holocene maize and squash domestication in the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106.13:5014-5018.

Return to footnote 134 referrer

Reference 135

Salvador, R.J. and Pearce, R.B. 1995. Proposed standard system of nomenclature for maize grain filling events and concepts. Maydica, Bergamo 40(1):141-146.

Return to footnote 135 referrer

Reference 136

Sánchez G, J. J., et al. 2011. Three new teosintes (Zea, Poaceae) from México. American journal of botany 98.9:1537-1548.

Return to footnote 136 referrer

Reference 137

Sandhu, K. S., Singh, N. and Kaur, M. 2004. Characteristics of the different corn types and their grain fractions: Physicochemical, thermal, morphological, and rheological properties of starches. Journal of food engineering 64(1):119-127.

Return to footnote 137 referrer

Reference 138

Seed Corn Growers of Ontario. 2006. Survey of seed and commercial corn diseases and pests in Ontario and Quebec in 2006 – PDF (55 kb). [Online]. [January 2020].

Return to footnote 138 referrer

Reference 139

Sewell, R. 1972. Plant-parasitic nematodes from Canada and abroad, 1970. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 52(1):32.

Return to footnote 139 referrer

Reference 140

Skibbe, D.S. and Schnable, P.S. 2005. Male sterility in maize. Maydica 50:367-376.

Return to footnote 140 referrer

Reference 141

Smith, C. W., Betrán, J. and E. C. A., R. 2004. Corn: Origin, history, technology, and production. John Wiley & Sons.

Return to footnote 141 referrer

Reference 142

Smith, J. L., DiFonzo, C. D., Baute, T. S., Michel, A. P., and Krupke, C. H. 2019. Ecology and Management of the Western Bean Cutworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Corn and Dry Beans–Revision With Focus on the Great Lakes Region. Journal of Integrated Pest Management, 10(1):27.

Return to footnote 142 referrer

Reference 143

Smith, J. L., T. S. Baute, M. M. Sebright, A. W. Schaafsma, and C. D. DiFonzo. 2018. Establishment of Striacosta albicosta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) as a primary pest of corn in the great lakes region. Journal of economic entomology 111(4):1732-1744.

Return to footnote 143 referrer

Reference 144

Statistics Canada Table 32-10-0416-01 Hay and field crops [January 25, 2021]

Return to footnote 144 referrer

Reference 145

Statistics Canada. 2015. Corn: Canada's third most valuable crop. [Online] [March 8, 2017].

Return to footnote 145 referrer

Reference 146

Statistics Canada Table 32-10-0359-01 Estimated areas, yield, production, average farm price and total farm value of principal field crops, in metric and imperial units [March 8, 2019].

Return to footnote 146 referrer

Reference 147

Su, A., Song, W., Xing, J., Zhao, Y., Zhang, R., Li, C., Duan, M., Luo, M. and Shi, Z. 2016. Identification of genes potentially associated with the fertility instability of S-type cytoplasmic male sterility in maize via bulked segregant RNA-Seq. PLoS ONE 11(9): e0163489.

Return to footnote 147 referrer

Reference 148

Tan S., Evans, R.R., Dahmer, M.L., Singh, B.K. and Shaner, D.L. 2005. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: history, current status and future. Pest Management Science 61:246-257.

Return to footnote 148 referrer

Reference 149

Townshend, J. and Potter, J. 1976. Evaluation of forage legumes, grasses, and cereals as hosts of forage nematodes. Nematologica 22(2):196-201.

Return to footnote 149 referrer

Reference 150

Turkington, T. K., Clear, R. M., Demeke, T., Lange, R., Xi, K. and Kumar, K. 2011. Isolation of Fusarium graminearum from cereal, grass and corn residues from Alberta, 2001-2003. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 33(2):179-186.

Return to footnote 150 referrer

Reference 151

USDA-ARS. 2018. National Genetic Resources Program. Germplasm Resources Information Network – (GRIN). National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, MD, USA. [Online] [13 November 2018].

Return to footnote 151 referrer

Reference 152

USDA-ERS. 2017. Corn: Background. [Online] [February 23, 2017].

Return to footnote 152 referrer

Reference 153

USDA-NRCS. 2016. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. [Online] [17 June. 2016].

Return to footnote 153 referrer

Reference 154

Vickery, V. R. and Kevan, D. K. M. 1986. The insects and arachnids of Canada. Part 14: The grasshoppers, crickets, and related insects of Canada and adjacent regions. Ulonata: Dermaptera, Cheleutoptera, Notoptera, Dictuoptera, Grylloptera and Orthoptera. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa Canada.

Return to footnote 154 referrer

Reference 155

Vrain, T. and Dupré, M. 1982. Distribution des nématodes phytoparasites dans les sols maraîchers du sud-ouest du Québec. Phytoprotection 63:79-85.

Return to footnote 155 referrer

Reference 156

Walker, M. 1966. Some records of known and suspected plant parasitic nematodes encountered in Canada in 1965. Canadian Insect Pest Review 44:250-255.

Return to footnote 156 referrer

Reference 157

Wallace, H. A. and Brown, W. L. 1988. Corn and its early fathers. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa.

Return to footnote 157 referrer

Reference 158

Wan, X., Wu, S., Li, Z., Dong, Z., An, X., Ma, B., Tian, Y. and Li, J. 2019. Maize genic male-sterility genes and their applications in hybrid breeding: Progress and perspectives. Molecular Plant 12:321-342.

Return to footnote 158 referrer

Reference 159

Weatherwax, P. 1916. Morphology of the flowers, Zea mays. Bulletin Torrey Botany Club 66:127-144.

Return to footnote 159 referrer

Reference 160

Welker, C. A., Kellogg, E. A. and Prado, J. 2014. Andropogoneae versus Sacchareae (Poaceae: Panicoideae): The end of a great controversy. Taxon 63(3):643-646.

Return to footnote 160 referrer

Reference 161

Wells, M.S., Reberg-Horton, S.C. and S.B. Miskly. 2016. Planting date impacts on soil water management, plant growth, and weeds in cover-crop-based no-till corn production. Agronomy Journal 108(1): 162–170.

Return to footnote 161 referrer

Reference 162

Wheelock, M.J. and O'Neal, M.E. 2016. Insect pollinators in Iowa cornfields: Community identification and trapping method analysis. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0143479.

Return to footnote 162 referrer

Reference 163

Wilkes, H. 1977. Hybridization of maize and teosinte, in Mexico and Guatemala and the improvement of maize. Economic Botany 31(3):254-293.

Return to footnote 163 referrer

Reference 164

Wu, L.Y. and Townshend, J. 1973. Paratylenchus tateae sp. (Paratylenchinae, Nematoda). Canadian Journal of Zoology 51(1):109-111.

Return to footnote 164 referrer

Reference 165

Wych, R. D. 1988. Production of hybrid seed corn. In G.F Sprague and J.W. Dudley, Eds. Maize and Maize Improvement. Agronomy Monographs No. 18; pp. 565-605. American Society of Agronomy: Madison, Wisconsin.

Return to footnote 165 referrer

Reference 166

Zenkteler, M. and Nitzsche, W. 1984. Wide hybridization experiments in cereals. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 68(4):311-315.

Return to footnote 166 referrer

Reference 167

Zhang, J., Friebe, B., Raupp, W. J., Harrison, S. A. and Gill, B. S. 1996. Wheat embryogenesis and haploid production in wheat x maize hybrids. Euphytica 90(3):315-324.

Return to footnote 167 referrer

Reference 168

Zhang, D., Wu, S., An, X., Xie, K., Dong, Z., Zhou, Y., Xu, L., Fang, W., Liu, S., Liu, S and others. 2018. Construction of a multicontrol sterility system for a maize male-sterile line and hybrid seed production based on the ZmMs7 gene encoding a PHD-finger transcription factor. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16:459-471.

Return to footnote 168 referrer

Reference 169

Zhu, X., Reid, L., Presello, D. and Woldemariam, T. 2000. Survey of corn pests in Ontario and Quebec in 1999. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 80:48-50.

Return to footnote 169 referrer

Reference 170

Zhu, X., Reid, L. M., Presello, D. and Woldermariam, T. 2001. Survey of corn pests in Ontario and Quebec in 2000. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 81:75-78.

Return to footnote 170 referrer

Reference 171

Zhu, X., Reid, L. M., Woldemariam, T., Tenuta, A. and Schaafsma, A. W. 2002. First report of gray leaf spot caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis on corn in Ontario, Canada. Plant Disease 86(3):327-327.

Return to footnote 171 referrer

Reference 172

Zhu, X., Reid, L. M., Woldemariam, T., Tenuta, A., Lachance, P. and Pouleur, S. 2006. Survey of corn diseases and pests in Ontario and Quebec in 2005. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 86.

Return to footnote 172 referrer

Reference 173

Zhu, X., Reid, L. M., Woldemariam, T. and Tenuta, A. 2007. Survey of corn diseases and pests in Ontario and Quebec in 2006. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 87:72-76.

Return to footnote 173 referrer

Language selection

On this page