Alternaria in Selected Foods - April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2018 and April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2022

Food chemistry – Targeted surveys – Final report

Summary

Targeted surveys provide information on potential food hazards and enhance the Canadian Food Inspection Agency's (CFIA's) routine monitoring programs. These surveys provide evidence regarding the safety of the food supply, identify potential emerging hazards, and contribute new information and data to food categories where it may be limited or non-existent. They are often used by the CFIA to focus surveillance on potential areas of higher risk. Surveys can also help to identify trends and provide information about how industry complies with Canadian regulations.

This targeted survey generated baseline surveillance data regarding Alternaria mycotoxin levels in selected foods on the Canadian retail market. The most important mycotoxins are alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), altuene (ALT) and L-tenuazonic acid (TeA). TeA is the most acutely toxic while AOH and AME have a lower toxicityFootnote 1. However, there are several reports on the mutagenic and genotoxic effects of AME and AOHFootnote 2 as well as a tendency to kill fetuses of ratsFootnote 3.

A total of 2597 samples of fresh bell/hot peppers, grain-based foods, infant foods, fruit juices, nut/seed products, pomegranate products, processed fruits and vegetables, sunflower oil, and grape-based wine were collected from retail locations in 6 cities across Canada and tested for AOH and AME. ALT and TeA were not included in the analytical method because of a lack of commercially available standards. AOH and/or AME were detected in 1554 (60%) of the samples. The levels of AOH and AME were summed so that the total mycotoxin levels are reported in this survey. The levels detected ranged from 0.046 parts per billion (ppb) to 880 ppb.

Currently in Canada, as in the rest of the world, there are no regulated levels for Alternaria mycotoxins in foods. Health Canada determined the levels of AOH and AME observed in the current survey are not expected to pose a concern to human health, therefore there were no recalls resulting from this survey. CFIA is conducting appropriate follow up activities which include further testing of similar products in subsequent years.

Other regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Australia/New Zealand and the European Union are not monitoring their foods for Alternaria mycotoxins or are not currently publishing the results. A comparison of the exposure of Canadian consumers to persons in other countries is not possible. All data was shared with Health Canada. This data may be used in future risk assessments and to set standards in Canada and/or internationally.

What are targeted surveys

Targeted surveys are used by the CFIA to focus its surveillance activities on areas of highest health risk. The information gained from these surveys provides support for the allocation and prioritization of the agency's activities to areas of greater concern. Originally started as a project under the Food Safety Action Plan (FSAP), targeted surveys have been embedded in the CFIA's regular surveillance activities since 2013. Targeted surveys are a valuable tool for generating information on certain hazards in foods, identifying and characterizing new and emerging hazards, informing trend analysis, prompting and refining health risk assessments, highlighting potential contamination issues, as well as assessing and promoting compliance with Canadian regulations.

Food safety is a shared responsibility. The CFIA works with federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments and provides regulatory oversight of the food industry to promote safe handling of foods throughout the food production chain. The food industry and retail sectors in Canada are responsible for the food they produce and sell, while individual consumers are responsible for the safe handling of the food they have in their possession.

Why did we conduct this survey

The variety of fresh bell/hot peppers, grain-based foods, infant foods, fruit juices, nut/seed products, pomegranate products, processed fruits and vegetables, sunflower oil, and grape-based wine is continuously increasing to meet consumers' demands. These foods and beverages are consumed to some extent by Canadian consumers, including infants and toddlers. Moulds may develop in the field, during transport and/or during storage on the raw ingredients of these foods and beverages. Alternaria is a type of mould widely distributed in the soil and occurs in the air. These species are known as plant pathogens and as common allergens in humans.

Alternaria species also produce multiple toxins called mycotoxins. The most important ones are AOH, AME, ALT and TeA. Due to the common presence of Alternaria, these mycotoxins are frequently found in a wide variety of commodities. Thesemycotoxins have been recorded in fruits, such as apples, dark grapes, and citrus fruits, in vegetables like tomatoes, peppers and olives, and in fruit juices and beverages. They have also been found in grains such as wheat and barley, in sunflower seeds, and in wine. Alternaria has been reported to be the most frequent fungi infecting tomatoesFootnote 4.

Among the mycotoxins produced by this mould, TeA has the highest acute toxicity. In a study on mice, the oral administration of TeA salts to mice and rats resulted in cardiovascular collapseFootnote 1. While the acute toxicity of AOH and AME is low, these mycotoxins have shown genotoxic and mutagenic properties in cell cultures and laboratory animalsFootnote 2. These mycotoxins have been observed to kill rat fetusesFootnote 3. Inhalation of the mould can lead to asthma, infections and allergies. Dietary exposure has been linked to a variety of adverse health effects. TeA has been associated with human hematological disordersFootnote 4.

The primary source of these mycotoxins in the human diet is fruitFootnote 6. There are no Canadian or international regulations for TeA, ALT, AOH and/or AME levels in foodsFootnote 6. The use of fungicide is the most common approach to preventing mould formation.

The main objectives of this targeted survey were to generate baseline surveillance data on the levels of mycotoxins in foods that are known or suspected to be contaminated by the mould. In addition, the prevalence and levels of AOH and/or AME in this survey were compared with those reported in found other studies in the scientific literature. Most mycotoxins are not routinely monitored under other CFIA programs.

What did we sample

A variety of domestic and imported products from the following categories were sampled including: fresh bell/hot peppers, grain-based foods, infant foods, fruit juices, nut/seed products, pomegranate products, processed fruits and vegetables, sunflower oil, and grape-based wine. Products were sampled from April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2018 and from April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2022. Samples of products were collected from local/regional retail locations located in 6 major cities across Canada. These cities encompassed 4 Canadian geographical areas:

  • Atlantic (Halifax)
  • Quebec (Montreal)
  • Ontario (Toronto and Ottawa)
  • West (Vancouver and Calgary)

The number of samples collected from these cities was in proportion to the relative population of the respective areas. The samples originated in 44 countries.

Table 1. Distribution of samples based on product type and origin
Product type Number of domestic samples Number of imported samples Number of samples of unspecified Table Note a origin Total number of samples
Fresh pepper 20 53 6 79
Grain-based foods 258 225 272 755
Infant foods 34 160 64 258
Juices 123 64 30 217
Nut/seed products 22 78 47 147
Pomegranate products 156 250 176 582
Processed fruits and vegetables 24 135 84 243
Sunflower oil 4 16 21 41
Wine 73 200 2 275
Total 714 1181 702 2597

How were samples analyzed and assessed

Samples were analyzed by an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited food testing laboratory under contract with the Government of Canada. The results are based on the food products as sold and not necessarily as they would be consumed.

There are no regulations in Canada or elsewhere in the world for Alternaria mycotoxins in foodsFootnote 5. In the absence of a specific maximum level, the levels of Alternaria mycotoxins are assessed by Health Canada on a case-by-case basis using the most current scientific data available.

What were the survey results

A total of 2597 samples of domestic and imported fresh peppers, grain-based foods, infant foods, juices, nut/seed products, pomegranate products, processed fruits and vegetables, sunflower oil, and wine were tested for the AOH and AME. ALT and TeA were not included in the analytical method because of a lack of commercially available standards. AOH and/or AME were detected in 1554 (60%) of the samples. The levels of AOH and AME were summed so that the total mycotoxin levels are reported in this survey. The total levels ranged from 0.046 ppb to 880 ppb. A summary of the testing results by each product type can be seen in Table 2.

The percentage of samples with mycotoxin levels detected ranged from 0% in fresh peppers to 81% in grain-based foods. The average level ranged from 1.9 ppb in wine to 165 ppb in pomegranate products. See Appendix A for a more detailed breakdown of the results by type of commodity (for example, by type of juice).

Table 2. Levels of Alternaria toxins in fresh peppers, grain-based foods, infant foods, juices, nut/seed products, pomegranate products, processed fruits and vegetables, sunflower oil, and wine
Product type Total number of samples Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Fresh pepper 79 0 (0) 0 0 0
Grain-based foods 755 610 (81) 0.090 240 4.2
Infant foods 258 197 (76) 0.10 26 5.2
Juices 217 82 (38) 0.050 340 6.0
Nut/seed products 147 96 (65) 0.046 20 2.8
Pomegranate products 243 179 (74) 0.060 870 165
Processed fruits and vegetables 582 192 (33) 0.050 880 8.7
Sunflower oil 41 31 (76) 0.10 62 5.9
Wine 275 167 (61) 0.092 21 1.9
Total 2597 1554 (60) 0.046 871 23

What do the survey results mean

The detection rates for Alternaria mycotoxins in imported fresh peppers, grain-based foods, infant foods, juices, nut/seed products, pomegranate products, processed fruits and vegetables, sunflower oil, and wine in this survey were comparable to or lower than those reported in other survey yearsFootnote 7 and/or other cited scientific literatureFootnote 8Footnote 9Footnote 10Footnote 11Footnote 12Footnote 13Footnote 14Footnote 15Footnote 16Footnote 17Footnote 18Footnote 19Footnote 20Footnote 21Footnote 22Footnote 23Footnote 24Footnote 25Footnote 26Footnote 27Footnote 28Footnote 29Footnote 30. The average and highest observed levels in this survey were comparable to or lower than those reported in previous years. Also consistent with other surveys, the level of these mycotoxins was observed to be lower in commonly consumed juices such as apple, orange and grape juices, and higher in juices containing pomegranate as a main ingredient.

Table 3. Levels of AOH and/or AME in fresh sweet and hot peppers in the CFIA survey and scientific literature
Product type Jurisdiction/author Survey year Number of samples - toxins included in the survey Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Fresh pepper CFIA 2020 79 0 (0) 0 0 0
Fresh pepper Italy - Gambacorta et al. 2018 7 - AME 6 (86) <0.16 270.7 111.1
Fresh pepper Italy – Gambacorta et al. 2018 7 - AOH 4 (57)* <0.99 17.8 10.0
Fresh pepper Argentina - Da Cruz Cabral et al. 2016 10 - AME 2 (21) 3 98 29
Fresh pepper Argentina - Da Cruz Cabral et al. 2016 14 - AOH 4 (29) 7 262 56
Table 4. Levels of AOH and/or AME in grain-based foods in CFIA and from scientific literature
Product type Jurisdiction/author Survey year Number of samples - toxins included in the survey Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Barley-based foods CFIA 2021 123 78 (63) 0.093 240 5.7
Barley-based foods Russia - Orina et al. 2021 49 - AOH 5 (10) 2 8 Not specified
Barley-based foods Russia – Orina et al. 2021 49 - AME 1 (2) Not specified 3 Not specified
Barley-based foods Argentina - Castañares et al. 2019 60 - AME 37 (62) 368 1689 700
Barley-based foods Argentina – Castañares et al. 2019 60 - AOH 5 (8) 384 6812 2201
Barley-based foods EU – EFSA 2016 106 - AOH 2 (1) 0.1 6.1 3.1
Barley-based foods EU – EFSA. 2016 106 - AME 5 (5) 0.2 1.3 0.7
Barley-based foods Sweden – Häggblom et al. 2007 14 - AME Not specified Not specified Not specified 142
Barley-based foods Sweden – Häggblom et al. 2007 14 - AOH Not specified Not specified Not specified 25
Corn-based foods CFIA 2020 52 37 (71) 0.20 6.7 2.0
Corn-based foods EU – EFSA 2016 145 - AOH 2 (1) 0.1 6.1 3.1
Corn-based foods EU – EFSA. 2016 243 - AME 2 (1) 0.1 3.0 1.5
Rice-based foods CFIA 2020 53 37 (70) 0.10 2.3 0.80
Rice-based foods EU – Patriarca et al. 2016 31 6 (19) 1.83 2.97 Not specified
Rice-based foods EU - EFSA 2016 145 - AOH 2 (1) 0.1 6.1 3.1
Rice-based foods EU - EFSA 2016 243 - AME 2 (1) 0.1 3.0 1.5
Sorghum-based foods Ethiopia – Chala et al. 2014 70 - AOH 41 (58.6) Not specified 104 18
Sorghum-based foods Ethiopia – Chala et al. 2014 70 - AME 61 (87.1) Not specified 171 16.6
Sorghum-based foods India – Ansari et al. 1990 20 7 (35) 0.60 1.8 1.0
Wheat-based foods CFIA 2021 122 99 (81) 0.10 29 2.2
Wheat-based foods CFIA 2020 1 1 (100) N/A 3.5 N/A
Wheat-based foods CFIA 2017 283 247 (87) 0.090 37 2.2
Wheat-based foods Russia – Orina et al. 2021 116 - AOH 36 (31) 2 44 Not specified
Wheat-based foods Russia – Orina et al. 2021 116 - AME 17 (14) 3 56 Not specified
Wheat-based foods EU - EFSA 2016 99 - AOH 3 (2) 0.3 8.1 4.2
Wheat-based foods EU - EFSA 2016 99 - AOH 1 (1) 0.03 3. 1.6
Wheat-based foods Sweden – Häggblom et al. 2007 14 - AME Not specified Not specified Not specified 22
Wheat-based foods Sweden – Häggblom et al. 2007 14 - AOH Not specified Not specified Not specified 24
Wheat-based foods Czech Republic – Skarkova et al. 2005 129 - AOH 60 (46.5) 6.3 44.4 7.7
Wheat-based foods Czech Republic – Skarkova et al. 2005 129 - AME 0 (0) 0 0 0

N/A = not applicable

Table 5. Levels of AOH and/or AME in infant foods in CFIA surveys and from scientific literature
Product type Jurisdiction/author Survey year Number of samples - toxins included in the survey Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Infant food - puree CFIA 2019 108 94 (87) 0.52 26 7.9
Infant food - puree CFIA 2016 58 42 (72) 0.20 37 4.4
Meal - toddler/baby CFIA 2019 90 60 (67) 0.10 12 1.1
Meal - toddler/baby CFIA 2016 2 1 (50) N/A 1.2 N/A
Fruit Puree China – Xing et al. 2021 80 8 (10) 2.28 16.98 8.23

N/A = not applicable

Table 6. Levels of AOH and/or AME in juices in CFIA surveys and from scientific literature
Product type Jurisdiction/author Survey year Number of samples - toxins included in the survey Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Juices CFIA 2015 147 72 (49) 0.050 340 6.6
Juices CFIA 2014 75 15 (20) 0.20 200 28
Juices CFIA. 2018 174 125 (72) 0.050 570 17
Juices EU - Patriarca et al. 2016 95 41 (43) 0.13 20.19 Not specified
Juices China - Fan 2016 15 9 (60) 0.13 8.68 2.56
Juices Italy – Prelle et al. 2012 10 0 (0) 0 0 0
Juices Canada – Lau et al. 2003 19 15 (79) 0.62 40.6 6.16
Juices Canada – Scott et al. 1997 8 3 (38) 0.8 5.0 2.7
Juices Spain – Delgado et al. 1993 to 1994 32 16 (50) 1.35 5.42 Not specified
Table 7. Levels of AOH and/or AME in nut/seed products in CFIA surveys and from scientific literature
Product type Jurisdiction/author Survey year Number of samples - toxins included in the survey Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Nut/seed products CFIA 2020 113 65 (58) 0.046 6.2 1.4
Nut/seed products CFIA 2017 34 31 (91) 0.20 20 5.6
Nut/seed products CFIA 2018 to 2019 50 36 (72) 0.054 55 6.0
Nut/seed products EU – Patriarca et al. 2016 11 7 (64) 16.64 60 Not specified
Nut/seed products EU - EFSA 2016 587 - AOH 42 (7) 1.0 44.5 15.5
Nut/seed products EU - EFSA 2016 585 - AME 53 (9) 0.5 17.5 9.3
Nut/seed products Argentina - Chulze et al. 1995 150 134 (89) 30 1512 286
Nut/seed products Argentina – Torres et al. 1993 50 38 (76) 90 1026 415
Table 8. Levels of AOH and/or AME in pomegranate products in CFIA surveys and from scientific literature
Product type Jurisdiction/author Survey year Number of samples - toxins included in the survey Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Pomegranate products CFIA 2019 187 124 (66) 0.060 870 160
Pomegranate products CFIA 2015 51 50 (98) 2.6 620 180
Pomegranate products -Fruit Middle East – Elhariry et al. 2016 110 - AOH 56 (51) 0.71 19.2 Not specified
Pomegranate products Middle East – Elhariry et al. 2016 110 - AME 75 (68) 0.9 32.02 Not specified
Pomegranate products - Juice Middle East – Elhariry et al. 2016 8 - AOH 4 (50) 3.14 4.85 3.91
Pomegranate products - Juice Middle East – Elhariry et al. 2016 8 - AME 4 (50) 4.49 6.07 5.26
Table 9. Levels of AOH and/or AME in processed fruits and vegetables in CFIA and from scientific literature
Product type Jurisdiction/author Survey year Number of samples - toxins included in the survey Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
PFV (fruit-based) CFIA 2016 333 109 (33) 0.050 150 3.4
PFV (fruit-based) EU - EFSA 2016 229 - AOH 11 (5) 1.0 8.8 6.1
PFV (fruit-based) EU - EFSA 2016 217 - AME 9 (4) 0.03 8.7 3.6
PFV (tomato-based) CFIA 2016 100 41 (41) 0.060 350 9.4
PFV (tomato-based) CFIA 2015 101 36 (36) 0.080 880 25
PFV (tomato-based) EU - EFSA 2016 99 - AOH 3 (3) 2.5 17.1 10.2
PFV (tomato-based) EU - EFSA 2016 118 - AME 14 (12) 0.6 3.6 2.2
PFV (tomato-based) EU - Patriarca et al. 2016 70 - AOH 52 (74) <1.4 41.6 Not specified
PFV (tomato-based) EU - Patriarca et al. 2016 70 - AME 53 (76) <0.8 7.8 Not specified
PFV (tomato-based) Argentina - Terminiello et al. 2006 80 - AOH 5 (6) 187 8756 Not specified
PFV (tomato-based) Argentina – Terminiello et al. 2006 80 - AME 21 (26) 84 1734 Not specified
Table 10. Levels of AOH and/or AME in sunflower oils in CFIA surveys and from scientific literature
Product type Jurisdiction/author Survey year Number of samples - toxins included in the survey Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Sunflower Oil CFIA 2017 41 31 (76) 0.10 62 5.9
Oils CFIA 2018 90 50 (56) 0.10 57 7.1
Sunflower oil EU - EFSA 2016 35 - AOH 4 (11) 1.2 3.3 2.2
Sunflower oil EU - EFSA 2016 35 - AME 11 (31) 2.9 3.9 3.4
Sunflower oil EU - Patriarca et al. 2016 19 16 (84) 2.8 14 Not specified
Sunflower oil Hungary - Tölgyesi et al. 2020 16 0 (0) 0 0 0
Table 11. Levels of AOH and/or AME in grape wine in CFIA surveys and from scientific literature
Product type Jurisdiction/author Survey year Number of samples - toxins included in the survey Number (%) of positive samples Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Wine CFIA 2015 200 141 (70) 0.092 21 1.8
Wine CFIA 2014 75 26 (35) 0.50 11 2.6
Wine Germany - Zwickel 2016 14 - AME 13 (93) 0.80 1.45 1.19
Wine Germany - Zwickel 2016 25 - AOH 17/25 (68) 0.65 7.65 2.75
Wine Netherlands - López 2016 5 1 (20) <2.0 11 Not specified

Other regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Australia/New Zealand and the European Union are not currently publishing the testing results for Alternaria mycotoxins. A comparison of the exposure of Canadian consumers to these mycotoxins with persons in other countries is not possible.

Health Canada determined the levels of AOH and AME observed in the current survey are not expected to pose a concern to human health, therefore there were no recalls resulting from this survey. CFIA is conducting appropriate follow up activities which include further testing of similar products in subsequent years.

Appendix A

Table A1. More detailed distribution of levels of AOH and/or AME in juices, pomegranate-containing foods, infant foods, nut/seed products, and processed fruits and vegetables
Product type Product type/principal ingredient Total number of samples Number of samples with detected levels Min (ppb) Max (ppb) Average level (ppb) of positive results
Juices Apple juice 17 4 (24) 0.41 2.2 1.3
Juices Apricot nectar/juice 2 1 (50) N/A 4.2 N/A
Juices Blends 38 11 (29) 0.050 2.4 0.48
Juices Blueberry juice 3 2 (67) 0.170 340 170
Juices Cherry juice 2 2 (100) 7.6 8.7 16
Juices Cranberry juice 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Juices Grape juice 11 5 (45) 0.22 6.8 1.6
Juices Grape-based wine 275 167 (61) 0.092 21 1.9
Juices Guava juice/nectar 2 0 (0) 0 0 0
Juices Lemon juice 3 0 (0) 0 0 0
Juices Lemonade 6 1 (17) N/A 0.090 N/A
Juices Mango nectar/juice 16 2 (12) 0.25 2.0 1.1
Juices Orange juice 20 8 (40) 0.11 0.79 0.39
Juices Papaya juice 1 1 (100) N/A 0.92 N/A
Juices Peach juice 4 2 (50) 0.41 0.60 0.50
Juices Pear juice 2 2 (100) 1.9 4.4 3.1
Juices Pineapple juice 9 5 (56) 0.16 2.1 0.82
Juices Prune nectar 1 1 (100) N/A 0.090 N/A
Juices Smoothies 77 35 (45) 0.14 38 2.8
Juices Wildberry juice 2 0 (0) 0 0 0
Pomegranate foods Arils 40 19 (48) 0.060 67 4.2
Pomegranate foods Juice blends containing pomegranate 46 45 (98) 0.70 590 150
Pomegranate foods Pomegranate drinks 4 4 (100) 140 340 190
Pomegranate foods Fresh pomegranate 51 13 (25) 0.060 7.4 1.2
Pomegranate foods Pomegranate juice 99 98 (99) 1.9 870 220
Pomegranate foods Pomegranate seeds 3 0 (0) 0 0 0
Infant food - puree Fruit 145 119 (82) 0.20 37 6.6
Infant food - puree Fruit/vegetable 18 17 (94) 0.75 19 7.8
Infant food - puree Vegetable 3 0 (0) 0 0 0
Nut/seed products Almond 34 24 (70) 0.046 3.8 1.0
Nut/seed products Cashew 2 1 (50) N/A 3.5 N/A
Nut/seed products Hazelnut 2 2 (100) 1.2 1.3 1.2
Nut/seed products Mixed nuts 18 4 (22) 1.7 2.6 2.2
Nut/seed products Mixed seeds 12 11 (92) 0.10 3.4 1.5
Nut/seed products Mixed seeds & nuts 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Nut/seed products Peanut 32 13 (41) 0.10 2.7 0.76
Nut/seed products Pecan 3 2 (67) 1.4 3.4 2.4
Nut/seed products Pistachio 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Nut/seed products Sesame 6 6 (100) 1.0 4.0 1.9
Nut/seed products Sunflower seeds 36 33 (92) 0.20 20 5.5
Processed fruits and vegetables Apple 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Apricot 15 5 (33) 0.51 9.0 4.0
Processed fruits and vegetables Banana 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Blackberry 4 4 (100) 0.48 6.3 2.9
Processed fruits and vegetables Blueberry 11 6 (54) 0.26 9.2 3.7
Processed fruits and vegetables Cherry 8 6 (75) 0.093 8.2 1.7
Processed fruits and vegetables Cranberry 37 15 (40) 0.10 1.5 0.68
Processed fruits and vegetables Currant 4 3 (75) 0.10 0.30 0.23
Processed fruits and vegetables Date 25 1 (4) N/A 0.060 N/A
Processed fruits and vegetables Fig 26 11 (42) 0.14 150 22
Processed fruits and vegetables Goji berries 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Mango 11 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Mixed berries 31 13 (42) 0.13 5.0 1.1
Processed fruits and vegetables Mixed Fruit 51 13 (25) 0.097 6.2 1.3
Processed fruits and vegetables Papaya 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Peach 5 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Pear 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Pepper 27 1 (4) N/A 0.82 N/A
Processed fruits and vegetables Pepper - Hot 21 5 (24) 0.099 2.4 1.1
Processed fruits and vegetables Pineapple 2 1 (50) N/A 0.97 N/A
Processed fruits and vegetables Prune 27 10 (37) 0.11 3.3 0.70
Processed fruits and vegetables Raisin 25 8 (32) 0.050 2.2 0.99
Processed fruits and vegetables Raspberry 13 5 (38) 0.12 1.7 0.77
Processed fruits and vegetables Saskatoon berry 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Strawberry 32 8 (25) 0.093 3.2 0.65
Processed fruits and vegetables Tomato - crushed 16 10 (62) 0.090 5.2 0.99
Processed fruits and vegetables Tomato - diced 85 28 (33) 0.070 350 13
Processed fruits and vegetables Tomato - paste 1 1 (100) N/A 0.50 N/A
Processed fruits and vegetables Tomato - sauce 45 28 (62) 0.060 3.9 0.81
Processed fruits and vegetables Tomato - stewed 6 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Tomato - strained 1 0 (0) 0 0 0
Processed fruits and vegetables Tomato - whole 47 10 (21) 0.080 880 88

N/A = not applicable