This page has been archived
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or record-keeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
| Evaluation Recommendation | Management Response (Agree or Disagree and if Disagree, reason why) | Action Plan | Lead (position) Target Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recommendation 1: Review F/P/T MOUs to determine if a higher level of consistency can be attained
The F/P/T MOUs between CFIA and the P/Ts should be reviewed to determine if certain components can be made more consistent. Aligning the MOUs, to the extent possible, will help to clarify the expectations of various partners involved in emergency management of foodborne illness outbreak. This would be particularly valuable to those working on food investigations at the federal level, who deal with P/T health ministries and laboratories. A possible forum for identifying common ground would be an expanded set of table-top exercises. |
Agree
The FIORP is intended to serve as a guidance document for P/T partners to develop individual food illness outbreak response plans aligned with the FIORP. |
There are CFIA/Provincial MOU's with Ontario, British Columbia, Quebec and Alberta. These documents are tailored to each province.
A revision of the CFIA/Ontario MOU is underway. The new document "Ontario FIORP" or "ON-FIORP" is aligned with the FIORP. |
ED, Food Safety Directorate
CFIA/Ontario MOU completion March 31, 2012 March 31, 2012 |