Language selection


Integrated Agency Inspection Model – Consultation Draft (December 4, 2013)
8.0 Regulatory Response

This page has been archived

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or record-keeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

The CFIA has a mandate to respond to events that are initiated by lack of compliance on the part of regulated parties and by events that are the responsibility of the Agency to control, such as pest and disease incursions and contaminant events.

The CFIA responds to lack of compliance by regulated parties and is responsible for controlling pest, disease incursions and contaminant events.

This response includes various activities as described in the CFIA's Compliance and Enforcement Policy. The model proposes to apply a single, consistent policy across all commodities that are transparent and appropriate.

For more information, see the Compliance and Enforcement Operational Policy on the CFIA's website.

As the regulatory frameworks are modernized, this policy will be reviewed and updated as required.

The processes that lead to inspection decisions—or compliance and enforcement actions—must be objective, impartial and equitable. They must be in keeping with the CFIA's values and ethics and respect the regulated party's rights.

The appropriate level, type and extent of response will depend on a range of factors, including

Specific responses could be directed at the commodity (e.g. quarantine or detention) and/or the regulated party (e.g. issuance of a corrective action request). The inspector has the flexibility to select the appropriate response based on the situation. The range of CFIA regulatory actions can be found in the tools listed in Annex D. Figure 4 - Regulatory Response, illustrates the two streams of the CFIA's regulatory response and how they have the potential to interact with each other. Further detail on the activities within each stream is provided below.

8.1 CFIA response to non-compliance on the part of the regulated party (Figure 4 - Yellow stream)

The compliance and enforcement strategy is based on the principle that the regulated party is responsible for producing safe food, and healthy animals and plants that comply with regulatory requirements. CFIA's response is directed at the regulated party, including those who hold permissions and do not comply with regulatory requirements. The corrective measure must be carried out by the regulated party. The response to non-compliance follows:

Trigger: The CFIA becomes aware of, or conducts an inspection that, establishes non-compliance.

CFIA Response:

A formal request is issued to the regulated party to comply. This could take the form of a corrective action request or inspection report of technical violation.

If there is critical or serious non-compliance, any affected commodity is controlled and the non-compliance is addressed to prevent recurrence.

For example, an importer who has a history of importing non-compliant commodities may be required to submit evidence of compliance before the CFIA would give permission to import. The importer could be required to provide the CFIA with documentation from an accredited laboratory or other documented evidence of analytical results demonstrating compliance for five consecutive shipments following the finding of a non-compliant importation.

The CFIA conducts a follow-up inspection to confirm that effective corrective actions have been implemented and that any changes to a preventive control plan has been documented.

Failure to satisfactorily resolve the non-compliance results in enforcement actions by the CFIA.

8.2 CFIA response to a reportable pest, disease or contaminant event where the CFIA imposes control measures (Figure 4 - Grey stream)

In the case of a regulated animal disease, plant pest incursion or contaminant event in Canada, premises with or without licences may be subject to regulatory control actions to limit the spread as follows:

Trigger: When the CFIA becomes aware of the potential presence of a pest, disease or contaminant, an inspection to confirm its presence is performed. Regulatory control actions may be applied at this stage depending on the level of risk. Confirmatory testing will be performed according to established procedures.

If at any point it is discovered that the producer is in violation of legislation of their own volition, the CFIA will respond with appropriate compliance and enforcement actions. This response is described in 8.1 – CFIA response to non-compliance on the part of the regulated party.

CFIA Response Phase 1: Initial Management

The CFIA determines the scope of regulatory control actions and appropriate response required to contain or remove the contaminant, pest or disease. Control actions may include quarantine, seizure and detention, recall, disposal, etc.

These regulatory response activities continue until:

  • the threat is removed from the premises; or,
  • a policy decision is taken that it is more appropriate to de-regulate the contaminant, pest or disease rather than continue to attempt control or eradication; or,
  • a long-term management option is chosen.

CFIA Response Phase 2: Long-Term Management

When eradication is not possible or takes several years, the CFIA may order control actions that may include the establishment of regulated areas and movement and production controls. Licences with preventive control plans are required, for example, to demonstrate that the movement of commodities or regulated things will not result in the spread of the disease or pest.

A licence of this type may also be used for international trade out of compartments or recognized special status premises.

The CFIA recognizes that, for many regulated parties, the transition to this integrated inspection model would require time to:

  • develop and document a preventive control plan (if required),
  • make changes to their practices,
  • adapt to the risk-based approach described in the model, and
  • apply for a licence.

The CFIA understands that many regulated parties' business models would need to evolve. As part of its compliance promotion strategy, the CFIA intends to provide technical and educational outreach in a variety of formats. This would help facilitate transition as regulated parties gather information and interact with the CFIA online and in person (e.g. an online labelling tool, generic model systems). Compliance promotion complements rather than diminishes the CFIA's ability to take enforcement action.

Transitional enforcement guidelines would also be used in the initial stages of implementing the model.

Figure 4 – Regulatory Response. Description follows.
Figure 4 – Regulatory Response

In this Regulatory Response diagram, there are two rows with yellow and grey backgrounds. The yellow row indicates the response when industry is out of compliance while the grey row indicates the response when there is a contaminant/pest/disease event that is out of the control of the industry. These two events may use similar tools to be brought into compliance and both may be occurring at the same time.

Across the top of the diagram, outside the shaded areas, there are 4 boxes with thick arrows pointing down.

The first box is called Regulated Parties and it points to 3 boxes of regulated parties below:

  1. Licence (PCP)
  2. Licence (no PCP)
  3. No licence (PCP)
  4. No licence (no PCP)

The second box and arrow is called Possible Triggers and this box points to 2 boxes below:

  1. Non-compliance (eg. Serious, critical or technical violation)
  2. Contaminant/Plant Pest/Animal Disease – Suspected or detected.

Between the 3 boxes of regulated parties and the two boxes of triggers are arrows that indicate that any regulated party can be impacted by either of the two triggers.

The third box with an arrow pointing down is called CFIA response. This box points to 2 boxes below

  1. Notification to Comply – this box has a small red symbol indicating the CFIA regulatory toolkit which is a small box to one side of the diagram
  2. CFIA orders/ requires regulatory control action (yellow box) – Phase one (short term goal of control or eradication) – this box also has a red symbol indicating the CFIA Regulatory tool Kit.

Between the two trigger boxes is a straight arrow leading to each of the CFIA responses. There is also an arrow from the lower yellow box up to the upper box indicating that a notification to comply can also occur at that stage.

Both boxes have a horizontal arrow pointing to a triangle, which indicates the result of the action in the previous box.

  1. In the top row, the triangle says Industry complies
  2. In the bottom row, the triangle says Contaminant eliminated, Pest/Disease eradiciated

From each of the triangles are two arrows leading to a box containing Yes and No.

The last box at the top with an arrow pointing down is called Outcomes and it points to 4 boxes below:

  1. The box leading from the yes arrow in the first row says compliance (end of process)
  2. The box leading from the no arrow in the first row says Non-compliance and has a red regulatory tool kit symbol (end of process)
  3. The box leading from the yes arrow in the second row says Non-contaminant pest disease state (end of process)
  4. The box leading from the no arrow in the second row says Phase two: pest/disease requires on –going management/movement controls – this box has an arrow leading to the regulated party column and to the Licence (PCP) box.

To one side of the diagram and outside of the shaded area is a dotted box call the CFIA regulatory Tool Kit. This box has a red symbol that is in the boxes, as indicated above. Listed in this box is:

CFIA control actions:

e.g. Seizure and Detention, Quarantine Notices, Movement Controls, Treatment Order, Recall

Enforcement Actions:

e.g. Suspend/Cancel Licence/Permit, AMPS, Prosecution

Date modified: