Biology document BIO2022-01: A companion document to Directive 94-08 (Dir94-08), Assessment Criteria for Determining Environmental Safety of Plant with Novel Traits.
On this page
- 1. General administrative information
- 1.1 Background
- 1.2 Scope
- 2. Identity
- 2.1 Name(s)
- 2.2 Family
- 2.3 Synonym(s)
- 2.4 Common name(s)
- 2.5 Taxonomy and genetics
- 2.6 General description
- 3. Geographical distribution
- 4. Biology
- 4.1 Reproductive biology
- 4.2 Breeding and seed production
- 4.3 Cultivation and use as a crop
- 4.4 Gene flow during commercial seed and biomass production
- 4.5 Cultivated S. alba as a volunteer weed
- 4.5.1 Cultural/mechanical control
- 4.5.2 Chemical control
- 4.5.3 Integrated weed management
- 4.6 Means of movement and dispersal
- 5. Related species of S. alba
- 6. Potential interaction of S. alba with other life forms
- 7. References
1. General administrative information
1.1 Background
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency's (CFIA) Plant Biotechnology Risk Assessment (PBRA) unit is responsible for assessing the potential risk to the environment from the release of plants with novel traits (PNTs) into the Canadian environment.
Risk assessments conducted by the PBRA unit require biological information about the plant species being assessed. Therefore, these assessments can be done in conjunction with species-specific biology documents that provide the necessary biological information. When a PNT is assessed, these biology documents serve as companion documents to Dir94-08: Assessment Criteria for Determining Environmental Safety of Plants with Novel Traits.
1.2 Scope
This document is intended to provide background information on the biology of S. alba, including:
- its identity
- geographical distribution
- reproductive biology
- related species
- the potential for gene introgression from S. alba into relatives
- details of the life forms with which it has the potential to interact
Such information will be used during risk assessments conducted by the PBRA unit. Specifically, it may be used to characterize the potential risk from the release of the plant into the Canadian environment with regard to:
- weediness/invasiveness
- gene flow
- plant pest properties
- impacts on other organisms
- impacts on biodiversity
2. Identity
2.1 Name(s)
Sinapis alba L.Footnote 1
2.2 Family
Brassicaceae (alt. Cruciferae) family, commonly known as the mustard familyFootnote 1.
2.3 Synonym(s)
The most encountered synonym for S. alba is Brassica hirta Moench. The name B. hirta was given by Moench in 1802; in 1839, Rabenhorst named this species Brassica alba (L.) Rabenh.; ultimately, the name Sinapis alba L. was adoptedFootnote 2.
Other synonyms for S. alba include:
- Bonannia officinalis C.Presl
- Brassica alba Moench
- Brassica foliosa (Willd.) Samp.
- Crucifera lampsana E.H.L.Krause
- Eruca alba (L.) Noulet
- Leucosinapis alba (L.) Spach
- Napus leucosinapsis K.F.Schimp. & Spenn.
- Raphanus albus (L.) Crantz
- Rhamphospermum album (L.) Andrz. ex Rchb.
- Rorippa coloradensis Stuckey
- Sinapis alba ssp. dissecta (Lag.) Bonnier
- Sinapis alba var. melanosperma Alef.
- Sinapis foliosa Willd.Footnote 3,Footnote 4,Footnote 5
2.4 Common name(s)
The common name 'mustard' can refer to multiple species, including S. alba and Brassica juncea (L). Czern & Coss. (brown and oriental mustard)Footnote 6,Footnote 7. S. alba is commonly known as white mustard and yellow mustardFootnote 1,Footnote 5,Footnote 8. It may also be referred to as:
- charlock
- kedlock
- rough mustard
- tame mustardFootnote 3
2.5 Taxonomy and genetics
S. alba has 2n = 24 chromosomesFootnote 9,Footnote 10.
Taxon | Scientific name and common name |
---|---|
Kingdom | Plantae (plants) |
Subkingdom | Viridiplantae (green plants) |
Superdivision | Embryophyta |
Division | Tracheophyta (vascular plants, tracheophytes) |
Class | Magnoliopsida |
Super order | Rosanae |
Family | Brassicaceae (mustards, moutardes, crucifers) |
Tribe | Brassiceae |
Genus | Sinapis L. (mustard) |
Species | Sinapis alba L. (white mustard) |
There are 3 subspecies of S. alba; only S. alba subsp. alba is naturalized in North America:
- Sinapis alba subsp. alba (cultivated)
- Sinapis alba subsp. dissecta (Lag.) Simonk.
- Sinapis alba subsp. mairei (H.Lindb.) MaireFootnote 1,Footnote 11
2.6 General description
Plants grow to approximately 1 mFootnote 12,Footnote 13. S. alba has yellow, alternate flowers with 4 sepals alternating with 4 petals, typical of the BrassicaceaeFootnote 3. Leaves are deeply pinnately lobedFootnote 14. Pods are 2.0 to 4.2 centimetres long and have a long flat beak that occupies about one-third of the lengthFootnote 8. Pods contain 2 to 4 seeds in each loculus separated by a false septumFootnote 8. Both yellow- and brown-seeded forms exist, with yellow-seeded S. alba commonly cultivatedFootnote 7,Footnote 8. Seeds are spherical or oval, approximately 2 to 3 millimetres in diameterFootnote 15.
S. alba has a similar life cycle and growth pattern to Brassica napus L. (canola/rapeseed). The phenological growth stages of S. alba can be classified using the BBCH systemFootnote 16.
Principal growth stages
- 0: germination
- 1: leaf development
- 2: side shoot development
- 3: stem elongation
- 4: vegetable plant part development
- 5: inflorescence emergence
- 6: flowering
- 7: fruit development
- 8: ripening
- 9: senescence
These main growth stages can be further subdivided to indicate points in plant developmentFootnote 7.
S. alba may be confused with Sinapis arvensis L. (wild mustard) and other annual yellow-flowered mustards. A key to identifying mature plants including S. alba and S. arvensis can be found in Warwick, BeckieFootnote 17.
3. Geographical distribution
3.1 Origin and history of introduction
S. alba originates from the Middle East and Mediterranean regionsFootnote 18,Footnote 19. S. alba has been cultivated as a condiment crop for thousands of yearsFootnote 18. In the western Canadian prairies, commercial production of S. alba began on a small scale in 1936Footnote 12. The Canadian mustard acreage (combined production of S. alba and Brassica juncea) gradually increased. In 1951, 40,850 acres were seeded in Canada. Acreage climbed to 131,050 acres in 1960 and 200,000 acres in 1970. Since 1970, the annual seeded acres have ranged from 87,000 (1976) to 840,000 (2003)Footnote 20. S. alba usually makes up 40 to 60 percent of the mustard acreageFootnote 21.
3.2 Native range
The native range of S. alba includes the Mediterranean Region and some surrounding countriesFootnote 1. The Mediterranean Region includes parts of Europe, Africa, and Asia.
3.3 Introduced range
S. alba is introduced and widely naturalized in:
- Canada
- the continental United States
- the Caribbean TerritoriesFootnote 1,Footnote 5
3.4 Potential range in North America
S. alba occurs over a large range in Canada, including in the YK, BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, QB, NB, NS, and PEFootnote 22,Footnote 23,Footnote 24. S. alba is predominantly found in areas it is cultivated, primarily in the brown and dark brown soil zones of the western Canadian Prairies and the northern Great Plains of the United StatesFootnote 8. S. alba is uncommon in the Maritime provincesFootnote 22,Footnote 23. The potential future range includes all Canadian provinces and territories.
Geographical abbreviations:
- YK: Yukon
- NT: North West Territories
- NU: Nunavut
- BC: British Columbia
- AB: Alberta
- SK: Saskatchewan
- MB: Manitoba
- ON: Ontario
- QB: Quebec
- NB: New Brunswick
- NS: Nova Scotia
- PE: Prince Edward Island
- NF: Newfoundland
- LB: Labrador
3.5 Habitat
S. alba is a cool-season crop that can perform well in a short growing seasonFootnote 7. S. alba can occur in cultivated fields, disturbed prairies, roadsides, and disturbed areasFootnote 3,Footnote 24. S. alba is primarily found in agricultural environments, where it can grow as a volunteer in the years following cultivationFootnote 25.
4. Biology
4.1 Reproductive biology
Flowering
S. alba is a long-day plantFootnote 26. Typically, long-day plants require light periods longer than a certain critical length to flower. However, Bodson et al. (1977) found it was possible to induce some flowering over 3 short days under experimental conditionsFootnote 26.
Pollen dispersal
At the time of writing, there is limited information on pollen dispersal distances and characteristics in S. alba. In a field experiment with plots of 4 rows of 10 meters and 45 cm between the rows, the intercrossing between neighbouring plots exceeded 30 percentFootnote 27. S. alba must be at least 200 meters from other varieties of S. alba and non-pedigreed S. alba to obtain adequate purity in Foundation or Registered seedFootnote 28. The pollen yield in S. alba is variable, typically ranging from 7 to 12 mg/10 flowersFootnote 29. S. alba pollen can be dispersed by insects and windFootnote 18,Footnote 29. Because of its nectar and pollen production, S. alba is recommended as a good melliferous plantFootnote 29. S. alba flowers are adapted to pollination by short-tongued bees and fliesFootnote 29,Footnote 30. Naumkin and Velkova (2013) identified and quantified insect pollinators in Russian S. alba fields from 2000 to 2012Footnote 31. Pollinators included:
- wild bees (Apidae)
- anthomyias (Anthomyiidae)
- honey bees (Apis mellifera)
- flower flies (Syrphidae)
- golden-eyed flies (Chrysophidae)
- lady beetles (Coccinellidae)
- bumblebees (Bombus spp.)Footnote 31
Pollination
S. alba is an obligate outcrossing speciesFootnote 32. Olsson (1960) measured the degree of outcrossing between individual plants of S. alba in experimental field plots to be up to 99.6%Footnote 27. The self-incompatibility mechanism is discussed in Śnieżko and Winiarczyk (1996)Footnote 32. When flowers are pollinated with pollen from the same plant, pollen grains can germinate on the stigma, but they do not grow in the pistil tissue.
Maturity
S. alba reaches maturity after approximately 3 monthsFootnote 12,Footnote 13.
4.2 Breeding and seed production
Standard breeding techniques
As S. alba is an obligate outcrossing speciesFootnote 27, recurrent selection has been widely used in breeding programsFootnote 33. Recurrent selection is not always effective for seed yield increase due to low heritability and limited natural variation within S. albaFootnote 10,Footnote 12. 3 varieties of S. alba (AC Pennant, AC Base and Andante) were developed from the same base population through several cycles of recurrent selectionFootnote 13. Rakow et al. (2009) explains the pedigree and selection scheme for these cultivarsFootnote 13.
Microspore production for S. alba has not been successfulFootnote 34. Seed mutagenesis can be usedFootnote 34.
Traits targeted by breeding programs
S. alba has uniformly high levels of hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate and resistance to many insects and diseasesFootnote 12. Most breeding efforts have focused on:
- seed-yield increaseFootnote 8,Footnote 12,Footnote 13
- lower husk-to-embryo ratioFootnote 12
- lower green seed countFootnote 12
- development of an edible oilseed S. alba for the production of vegetable oil and high protein mealFootnote 35,Footnote 36
- increased seed mucilage contentFootnote 13
- bright yellow seed colourFootnote 13
- herbicide toleranceFootnote 34
Seed production
Historically, the highest-quality commercial seed from the previous year's production was selected and grown in subsequent years. These landraces are believed to have been brought over from Europe, though the exact origins are unknownFootnote 12. Currently, S. alba is subject to variety registration listed on Schedule 3 of the Seeds Regulations (C.R.C., c. 1400). The Canadian Seed Growers Association has developed varietal purity standards for pedigree seed production of foundation, registered and certified seedFootnote 28. The Prairie Recommending Committee for Oilseeds evaluates the merit of new varieties and recommends varieties to the CFIA's Variety Registration OfficeFootnote 21.
4.3 Cultivation and use as a crop
Cultivation
Common practices applied during the cultivation of S. alba (for example, seeding, fertilization, chemical treatments, rotation, and harvesting) are discussed in detail in provincial crop production guides and extension material. Please refer to:
- the Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission's Mustard Production ManualFootnote 7
- the Government of Alberta's publication 'Mustard Production for Alberta'Footnote 15
- the Government of Manitoba's Guide to Mustard – Production and ManagementFootnote 37
Crop rotation
Often, S. alba follows a cereal crop in rotation. A break of several years between canola and mustards is often implemented to prevent contamination of mustard grain with canola containing genetically-engineered traits. In the brown and dark brown soil zones where S. alba is primarily grown, moisture is often limiting and rotating between deep and shallow-rooted crops can help manage soil moistureFootnote 7.
Weeds
Problematic weeds include:
- annual sow thistle (Sonchus asper)
- ball mustard (Neslia paniculata)
- Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense)
- cleavers (Galium aparine)
- common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris)
- cow cockle (Saponaria vaccaria)
- dandelion (Taraxacum officinale)
- dog mustard (Erucastrum gallicum)
- field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis)
- kochia (Bassia scoparia)
- narrow leaved hawk's beard (Crepis tectorum)
- perennial sow thistle (Sonchus arvensis)
- shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris)
- stinkweed (Thlaspi arvense)
- stork's bill (Erodium cicutarium)
- tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum)
- volunteer canola
- wild buckwheat (Polvgonum convolvulus)
- wild mustard
- wild oat (Avena fatua)Footnote 7,Footnote 15,Footnote 37
There are limited in-crop herbicides for use on S. alba. Many of these weeds have no registered in-crop herbicides to control themFootnote 15. Control of herbicide resistant weed biotypes in S. alba is challenging. Therefore, integrated weed management is important for controlling weeds in S. alba. Best practices include increasing the competitiveness of S. alba:
- using higher seeding rates
- seeding shallow
- using narrow row spacing
- providing optimal fertility
- using clean seed
- seeding early
- avoiding planting into fields with high weed pressureFootnote 7
Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Authority maintains a database of approved herbicidesFootnote 38. Please refer to this database for current information on registered herbicides for weed control in S. alba. Some herbicides may only be registered for use and sale in some provinces. Some herbicides may also be registered using a minor use registration.
The following herbicides may be applied to the soil before seeding, either in the late fall or in the early spring. Active ingredients include:
- triallate – a Group 8 (lipid synthesis inhibitors) herbicide used to control wild oat
- trifluralin – a Group 3 (microtubule assembly inhibitors) herbicide used to control a variety of broadleaf and grassy weeds
- sulfentrazone – a Group 14 (protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors) herbicide used to control kochia
- ethalfluralin – a Group 3 herbicide used to control many broadleaf and grassy weedsFootnote 7
Some Group 1 (ACCase inhibitors) herbicides, for example, clethodim, quizalofop, and sethoxydim, can be used for post-emergent control of grassy weedsFootnote 7,Footnote 38,Footnote 39. Glyphosate (Group 9: inhibitors of EPSP synthesis) can be used pre-harvest to control perennial weeds the following seasonFootnote 7. Saflufenacil (Group 14) can be used as a desiccantFootnote 38.
Use
The major market for S. alba is the North American condiment industry, where uses include traditional hot dog mustard, mayonnaise, and salad dressingsFootnote 7. S. alba may also be used:
- as a water-binding agent and protein extender in prepared meatsFootnote 7
- as a feedstock for biodiesel productionFootnote 40
- for varied industrial applications because the seed coat mucilage has emulsifying, water-holding, and stabilizing propertiesFootnote 41
- as a forageFootnote 42
S. alba seed powder has been considered for use a bioherbicideFootnote 43,Footnote 44.
4.4 Gene flow during commercial seed and biomass production
S. alba is not invasive of natural habitats in Canada. Therefore, the potential risk of gene flow to wild populations of S. alba is negligible.
Gene flow to cultivated populations of S. alba grown in proximity may occur. The Canadian Seed Growers' Association (CSGA) has set standards for producing foundation, registered and certified S. alba seedFootnote 28.
4.5 Cultivated S. alba as a volunteer weed
Following cultivation, volunteer S. alba can become weedy in subsequent crops. S. alba may also occur in prairies, roadsides, and disturbed areasFootnote 3,Footnote 11,Footnote 25,Footnote 45,Footnote 46. We found no record of substantial populations of S. alba in natural environments in Canada. S. alba is not listed in the Weed Seeds Order, 2016.
S. alba has not become an abundant weed despite cultivation since the 1930s in western Canada. It does not exhibit the weedy characteristics of S. arvensis. The difference in weed ranking among cultivated Brassicaceae species is largely attributed to differences in the acreage and, more recently, herbicide resistance in some species. S. alba may be less likely than some other Brassicaceae species to become a problematic volunteer weed because of attributes including shatter resistance. Weedy forms of S. alba occur in the Mediterranean region and some countries where S. alba is used as a green manure cropFootnote 47. In its native range, S. alba has developed tolerance to some Group 2 herbicidesFootnote 24,Footnote 48. Changes to the acreage or agronomic characteristics of S. alba in Canada may cause it to become more prevalent as a weed.
Seed dormancy
No studies were found that evaluated the length of time S. alba could remain in the seedbank in the Canadian environment. Cultivated S. alba does not exhibit notable levels of seed dormancy; seeds are often referred to as 'non-dormant'Footnote 49. Under suitable conditions, including adequate moisture and temperatures of at least 5 degrees celsius, seeds will germinate within 4 to 5 daysFootnote 49. Seeds can germinate within 24 hours when temperatures are approximately 20 degrees celsiusFootnote 49.
A study of seed dormancy in wild S. alba seeds collected in Israel found that dormancy was higher in seeds collected in the dry, hot southern part of Israel than seeds collected from the cooler, wetter northern regionFootnote 50. Temperature also played a role, with some seeds only expressing dormancy at high temperaturesFootnote 50. Germination of previously dormant S. alba seeds has been observed in the presence of gibberellic acidFootnote 50. Seed dormancy is observed in the related weedy species S. arvensisFootnote 51.
Susceptibility to shattering
S. alba pods rarely shatter at maturityFootnote 8,Footnote 52. Some intact ripe pods may be left in the field following harvest due to wind or mechanical actionFootnote 47.
Seed size
Seeds are large (approximately 4 to 6.1 grams per 1000 seeds) relative to canola (Brassica napus and B. rapa: 2 to 3 grams per 1000 seeds)Footnote 8,Footnote 13.
4.5.1 Cultural/mechanical control
Reducing harvest losses will minimize the number of potential S. alba volunteers. Losses can be reduced by properly setting combines and sealing any leaks. Control of S. alba volunteers in other crops or in fallow ground can readily be achieved by mechanical means.
4.5.2 Chemical control
Volunteer S. alba can be controlled using herbicides including:
- Bromoxynil/MCPA
- Dicamba + MCPA
- Dicamba/mecoprop/MCPA
- Fluroxypyr + MCPA
- Imazamox
- Imazamox/Imazethapyr
- Clopyralid/MCPA + FluroxypyrFootnote 39
4.5.3 Integrated weed management
S. alba volunteers rarely require special consideration in a weed management program. Integrated weed management (IWM) utilizes a combination of biological, cultural, mechanical, and chemical weed control tactics to manage weed populations and increase economic returns. IWM strategies for S. alba volunteers can include:
- scouting for weeds
- seeding at an optimum rate with high-quality seed to maximize competition and suppression of weeds
- planting into weed-free seedbeds
- appropriate use of herbicides
- reducing harvest loss
- tillageFootnote 15
4.6 Means of movement and dispersal
S. alba seed may disperse through pod shatter, seed spillage during human use (for example, during transportation), and as a contaminate of other crop seeds. Dry conditions between physiological maturity and straight combining and wind movement within the crop canopy can result in more pods breaking off or splitting open and losing seedsFootnote 53. Under adverse harvesting conditions in a Saskatchewan study, 5.2 percent of S. alba seeds were lost, compared to 1.4 percent under low shattering conditionsFootnote 53. Other mechanisms for the movement and dispersal of S. alba seeds are unclear. S. alba seeds might be dispersed by organisms that consume the seeds. Their ability to become established may depend upon the receiving environment; no reports of significant feral populations in natural environments were found.
5. Related species of S. alba
As stated in Section 2.5 Taxonomy and genetics, S. alba is a member of the tribe Brassiceae of the Brassicaceae family. Within the tribe Brassiceae, species can be divided into 2 evolutionary lineages: the Rapa/Oleracea lineage and the Nigra lineageFootnote 54. S. alba appears to be most closely related to the Nigra lineageFootnote 55. Further research is needed to clarify which species are wild crop relatives with the potential to receive gene flow from S. alba. The species in the Brassicaceae family were originally categorized primarily based on morphological characteristics; more recently, molecular research is providing continued insights into the evolutionary relationships. The genus Sinapis is polyphyletic: it includes 3 clades which each show a closer relationship to Brassica species or other members of the tribe Brassiceae than to each otherFootnote 55,Footnote 56,Footnote 57,Footnote 58,Footnote 59. S. alba appears to be more closely related to Kremeriella cordylocarpus (2n = 24), Hemicrambe fruticulosa (2n = 18), Coincya (5 spp. 2n = 24) and, possibly some species in Diplotaxis than to S. arvensis.
The genus Sinapis includes 6 species:
- Sinapis alba L.
- Sinapis allionii Jacq.
- Sinapis arvensis L.
- Sinapis circinata Desf.
- Sinapis flexuosa Poir.
- Sinapis pubescens L.Footnote 5
Of these, only S. alba and S. arvensis (charlock mustard, field mustard, wild mustard) are present in Canada.
S. arvensis is widespread in Canada and listed under Class 3 of the Canadian Weed Seeds Order, 2016 under the Seeds Act. S. arvensis is recorded in NT, YK, LB, NF, NS, PE, NB, QC, ON, MB, SK, AB, and BCFootnote 24. Frankton and Mulligan (1987) list it as a common annual weed; less problematic east of ManitobaFootnote 25. It is most abundant in Manitoba (Warwick et al., 2000a). In Saskatchewan, S. arvensis is considered a problematic weed, including in lentil productionFootnote 60. Its habitats include grain fields, cultivated fields, waste areas, fence rows, and roadsides. Controlling herbicide tolerant S. arvensis can be an agronomic challengeFootnote 61. The range of S. arvensis overlaps with the range of S. alba production at it is expected that these 2 species will grow in the same areas.
Brassicaceae comprises approximately 324 genera, including the following agronomically-important species:
- Brassica rapa (oilseed rape, Polish canola, turnip, bird rape)
- Brassica napus (Argentine rape, swede rape)
- Brassica juncea (brown mustard, Indian mustard)
- Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard)
- Brassica nigra (black mustard)
- Brassica oleracea (cabbage, cauliflower, Brussel sprouts, broccoli, Chinese cabbage, kale, kohlrabi)
- Raphanus sativus (radish)
- Camelina sativa (camelina)Footnote 1
The following details the distribution and habitat for each of these species in Canada, according to Warwick et al. (2013)Footnote 24.
Brassica rapa is recorded in NT, YK, LB, NF, NS, PE, NB, QB, ON, MB, SK, AB, and BC. Frankton and Mulligan (1987) suggest that it is sometimes abundant and that in some parts of the East, the wild form, bird rape, supplants S. arvensis over large areasFootnote 25. For more information, see The Biology of Brassica rapa LFootnote 62.
Brassica napus is recorded in NT, LB, NF, PE, NS, NB, QC, ON, MB, SK, AB, and BC. B. napus is not listed in Frankton and Mulligan (1987) but has become increasingly abundant as a volunteer weedFootnote 25. It ranked 18th in abundance during the 1970s and had risen to 14th since 2000 (Leeson et al., 2005). For more information, see The Biology of Brassica napus L. (Canola/Rapeseed)Footnote 63.
Brassica juncea is recorded in NT, NF, PE, NS, NB, QC, ON, MB, SK, AB, and BC. Frankton and Mulligan (1987) report that B. juncea occurs in every province and reaches its greatest abundance in the western provincesFootnote 25. For more information, see The Biology of Brassica juncea (Canola/Mustard)Footnote 64.
Brassica carinata has been successfully cultivated across Canada. For more information, see The Biology of Brassica carinata (A.) Braun (Abyssinian cabbage)Footnote 65.
Brassica nigra is recorded in NF, NS, NB, QC, ON, SK, AB, and BC. Frankton and Mulligan (1987) suggest that it is not very common in western CanadaFootnote 25.
Brassica oleracea is recorded in BC, AB, ON, and QC. B. oleracea rarely escapes from cultivation and is mainly found in fields, roadsides, and waste places.
Raphanus sativus is recorded in NU, NF, NS, PE, NB, QC, ON, MB, AB, SK, and BC. Frankton and Mulligan (1987) indicate that this species is occasionally persistent in gardens as a result of cultivationFootnote 25.
Camelina sativa is recorded in NT, BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, and QC. As a weed, C. sativa can be found in prairies, fields (grain, flax, alfalfa), open woods, lakeshore, around elevators, roadsides, railways, and waste places. For more information, see The Biology of Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz (Camelina)Footnote 6.
Weed species found in Canada in the Brassicaceae family include:
- Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard)
- Berteroa incana (hoary alyssum, false hoary madwort)
- Capsella bursa-pastoris (Shepherd's purse)
- Descurainia sophia (flixweed)
- Diplotaxis muralis (sand rocket, stinking wall rocket)
- Erucastrum gallicum (dog mustard)
- Lepidium draba (hoary cress)
- Raphanus raphanistrum (wild radish)
- Sisymbrium spp.
- Thlaspi arvense (stinkweed)
The following details the distribution and habitat for each of these species in Canada, according to Warwick et al. (2003)Footnote 24 unless otherwise cited.
Alliaria petiolata is recorded in BC, ON, QC, and NB. It is a winter annual or biennial that occurs in mixed to rich deciduous woodlands, fields, streamsides, gardens, roadsides, and waste places.
Berteroa incana is recorded in BC, ABFootnote 66, SK, MB, ON, QC, NB, and NS. It is a annual or biennial that occurs in dry fields, pastures, parklands, farmyards, edges of woods, gravel and sand pits, waterways, roadsides, and waste places.
Capsella bursa-pastoris is recorded in YK, NT, NU, BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, QC, NB, NS, PE, NF, and LB. It is an annual weed that occurs in cultivated fields (grain, hay, canola, potato, strawberry), gardens, orchards, vineyards, woods, pastures, meadows, flats, beaches, roadsides, railways, and waste places.
Descurainia sophia is recorded in YK, NT, BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, QC, NB, NS, PE, and NF. It is an annual or biennial found in dry disturbed meadows, grasslands, pastures, valleys, prairies, gardens, barnyards, grain and hay fields, roadsides, railways, and waste places.
Diplotaxis muralis is recorded in NS, PE, NB, QC, ON, MB, SK, and AB. Darbyshire (2003) lists it as an occasional weed of shores, railway lines, roadsides and disturbed areasFootnote 3. D. muralis is particularly abundant in irrigated areasFootnote 67.
Erucastrum gallicum is recorded in NT, BC, AB, NB, NS, PE, and NF. Frankton and Mulligan (1987) state that it reaches its greatest abundance in MB and SK where it inhabits fields, waste areas, railways, gardens and orchardsFootnote 25. It is very common on road sides and is an abundant field weed in many localities in western Canada (Warwick and Wall, 1998). E. gallicum is within the Brassiceae tribe but has not been placed in the same clade as S. alba.
Lepidium draba is recorded in BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, QB, and NS. It is a perennial, rhizomatous plant that occurs in grain fields, hayfields, pasture grasses and legumes, ditches and roadsides. It is listed as a noxious weed in CanadaFootnote 68.
Raphanus raphanistrum is recorded in LB, NF, NS, PE, NB, QC, ON, SK, AB, and BC. It is an annual, winter annual or biennial that occurs in fields and pastures. It occurs in cultivated fields, abandoned fields, gardens, grasslands, meadows, orchards, woods, cliffs, riverbanks, beaches, dunes, roadsides, railway lines and disturbed areas. It is listed as a noxious weed in CanadaFootnote 69.
Sisymbrium altissimum (tumble mustard) is recorded in YK, NT, BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, QC, NB, NS, PE, and NF. It is an annual that occurs on dry hillsides, fields, prairies, rangeland, pastures, high meadows, gardens, flats, wharves, roadsides, railways, and waste places.
Sisymbrium loeselii (tall hedge mustard) is recorded in BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, QC, and NB. It is an annual that occurs in dry cultivated fields, especially grain fields, prairies, rangelands, river banks, beaches, roadsides, railways, and waste places.
Sisymbrium officinale (hedge mustard) is reported in BC, AB, MB, ON, QB, NB, NS, and PE. It is an annual that occurs in open disturbed areas in fields, farmyards, gardens, lawns, streamsides, beaches, roadsides, railways, and waste places.
Thlaspi arvense is recorded in YK, NT, BC, AB, SK, MB, ON, QC, NB, NS, PE, NF, and LB. It is an annual or winter annual weed that occurs in fields (grain, hay, rape), gardens, rangeland, irrigated areas, sloughs, meadows, beaches, outcrops, roadsides, railways, and waste places.
Relatives not currently found in Canada:
Kremeriella and species from Hemicrambe and most species from Coincya are not recorded in North AmericaFootnote 70,Footnote 71,Footnote 72. Coincya monensis subsp. recurvata (star mustard) is an invasive species introduced to the United States from western Europe or northwestern AfricaFootnote 73. The species has spread quicklyFootnote 74 and is now reported in Michigan and PennsylvaniaFootnote 75. It is an annual or perennialFootnote 76. It is a colonist of open habitats found in disturbed areas such as fields, trails and railroad tracks in rocky and gravelly areasFootnote 76. It can also occur in maritime sands, sandy rivers, and cliffs, forming large dense stands that can exclude other speciesFootnote 76.
5.1 Inter-species/genus hybridization
As described above, our understanding of the relatives that S. alba may hybridize with is incomplete. Compared to the number of species in the Brassicaceae family, relatively few have been tested for compatibility with S. alba. In addition to molecular research to better identify relatives of S. alba, experiments are needed to determine the potential for S. alba to hybridize with weedy relatives including, C. monensis, D. muralis, S. arvensis, R. raphanistrum, and E. gallicum. Based on available information, we cannot determine the potential for S. alba to hybridize with related species.
FitzJohn et al. (2007) reviewed hybridization within the Brassicaceae family and found that most reported cross combinations were unsuccessful, and most crosses have only been reported onceFootnote 77. Where crosses were successful, rates of hybrid production were typically very low. No reports were found of successful hybridization under natural conditions between S. alba and any other speciesFootnote 78,Footnote 79.In rare cases, hand pollination was used to produce some hybrid offspringFootnote 80,Footnote 81 (see Table 1). S. alba has a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 24, meaning it has 2 sets of 12 chromosomes (1 from the paternal parent and 1 from the maternal parent). Many of the related species do not share the same number of chromosomes as S. alba and this will reduce sexual compatibilityFootnote 18. However, there are examples of successful crosses between species in the Brassicaceae family with different chromosome numbersFootnote 47.
In almost all cases where hybrids were obtained between S. alba and species from the Brassicaceae family, one of the following methods was used to overcome sexual incompatibility (see Table 2):
- sexual crosses combined with in vitro techniques, for example, ovary culture and embryo rescue
- somatic hybridization by protoplast fusionFootnote 78
Hybridization with other crop species
S. alba contains many agronomic traits that are of interest to breeding programs for related species, including insect and disease resistance. There have been many efforts to cross S. alba with species including B. napus, B. carinata, R. sativus, B. nigra, B. oleracea, and B. juncea (see Table 1 and Table 2).
Hybridization with related weeds and wild species
Compared to crop species, less effort has been placed on creating S. alba hybrids with weed species. FitzJohn et al. (2007) found no reported cases of attempted hybridization between S. alba and any non-crop speciesFootnote 77. S. arvensis is the only other species in the Sinapis genus found in Canada, and it is a troublesome weed. No reports of naturally occurring hybrids between S. arvensis and S. alba hybrids were found in the literatureFootnote 82. Nelson (1927) reported sterile hybrids from crosses between S. alba and charlock (a common name for S. arvensis), which produced small pods with no seedsFootnote 9. S. alba has 2n = 24 chromosomes, while S. arvensis has 2n = 18 chromosomesFootnote 83. This difference will reduce the likelihood of viable hybrids between these species. However further research is needed to confirm that S. arvensis and S. alba do not hybridize under field conditions.
Studies would be useful to assess the potential for gene flow between S. alba and:
- D. muralis (2n = 42)
- D. muralis is a recently formed allopolyploid and a widespread weed in Canada
- This may increase the likelihood of hybridization with additional taxa
- Successful conventional crosses have been made between D. muralis and both B. napus (AC and genomesFootnote 84) and B. rapa (A genomeFootnote 77)
- C. monensis (2n = 24, 48)
- S. arvensis (2n = 18)
- R. raphanistrum (2n = 18)
- R. raphanistrum is within the Brassiceae tribe but has not been placed in the same clade as S. alba
- However, following genetic analyses Raphaninae genera and S. alba have been included in the nigra lineage, suggesting that intergeneric hybridization may be possibleFootnote 55
- E. gallicum (2n = 30)
Cross female | Cross male | Description | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|
S. alba | Brassica napus | Unsuccessful | Lelivelt et al. 1993Footnote 85 |
S. alba | B. napus | Unsuccessful | Onteddu and Neelamraju 1996Footnote 86 |
B. napus | S. alba | Unsuccessful | Lelivelt et al. 1993Footnote 85 |
B. napus | S. alba | Unsuccessful | Onteddu and Neelamraju 1996Footnote 86 |
B. napus | S. alba | Conventional hybrid using hand pollination. 35 crosses resulted in 7 seeds; 5 germinated and produced a normal plant. Partial fertility in F1. <2% seed set when backcrossing F1 hybrids with S. alba; 33% seed set when backcrossing F1 hybrids with B. napus. | Bijral et al. 1993Footnote 80 |
S. arvensis (charlock) | S. alba | Sterile hybrids reported, which produced small pods with no seeds. | Nelson 1927Footnote 9 |
Brassica carinata / S. alba | S. alba / B. carinata | Unsuccessful | Sridevi et al. 2005Footnote 87 |
Raphanus sativus / S. alba | S. alba / R. sativus | Unsuccessful Embryos developed in approximately 4% of cases when S. alba was the female parent. These did not develop into hybrids. No development occurred when S. alba was the male parent. |
Bang et al. 1996Footnote 88 |
S. alba | Brassica nigra | Reciprocal crosses were made by hand in the field. Hybrids were only produced when S. alba was used as a female parent. Pollination of 87 S. alba buds resulted in 21 seeds, of which 3 hybrid plants were obtained. Hybrids had low fertility:
|
Choudhary and Joshi 2000Footnote 81 |
Hybridization | Description | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|
Brassica napus and S. alba |
PEG-mediated protoplast fusion did not yield plants with recombinant mitochondrial or chloroplast DNA. | Lelivelt et al. 1993Footnote 85 |
B. napus and S. alba |
Ovaries from reciprocal crosses were cultured in E12 medium that yielded 2.2 and 1.9% of interspecific hybrids when S. alba was used as the female and male parent, respectively. | Chèvre et al. 1994Footnote 89 |
B. napus and S. alba |
Electrically-induced protoplast fusion yielded 7 somatic hybrids. Hybrids were grown to full maturity and set seeds after self-pollination or backcrossing with B. napus. | Wang et al. 2005Footnote 90 |
B. napus and S. alba |
A combination of ovary culture and embryo rescue techniques resulted in 2 fertile hybrids. S. alba was the female parent in each. | Brown et al. 1997Footnote 14 |
B. napus and S. alba |
Somatic hybrids of B. napus and S. alba were obtained by electrofusion; hybrids were subsequently backcrossed; a stable male sterile line was selected from the progenies of somatic hybrids and characterized. | Wang et al. 2005Footnote 90; Li et al. 2009Footnote 91; Wang et al. 2014Footnote 92 |
B. napus and S. alba |
F1 male sterile hybrid plants with 31 or 43 chromosomes were obtained using embryo rescue when S. alba was the female parent. Hybrids were backcrossed to B. napus using embryo rescue and these hybrids has viable pollen. | Ripley and Arnison 1990Footnote 93 |
B. napus and S. alba |
Protoplast fusion was used to obtain somatic hybrids with low fertility. | Primard et al. 1988Footnote 2 |
Brassica oleracea and S. alba | 27 plants were regenerated from protoplast fusion. Somatic hybrids produced little pollen. | Gaikwad et al. 1996Footnote 94 |
B. oleracea and S. alba | B. oleracea as male parent and S. alba as female parent, 11 hybrid plants were obtained using a combination of ovary culture and embryo rescue. 2 seedlings of the reciprocal cross were generated but lost during the propagation. | Li et al. 2017Footnote 95 |
B. oleracea and S. alba | Somatic hybrids obtained using protoplast fusion. Backcrosses with the B. oleracea parent were unsuccessful. 344 seeds were obtained from inter-valence crosses with tetraploid B. oleracea and further investigated. | Nothnagel et al. 1997Footnote 78 |
S. alba and Brassica carinata | Hybrids produced through embryo rescue. | Sridevi et al. 2005Footnote 87 |
S. alba and Brassica juncea | Somatic hybrids obtained by protoplast electrofusion. Hybrids were male-sterile, but produced seeds on backcrossing with B. juncea. | Gaikwad et al. 1996Footnote 94 |
S. alba and B. juncea | Stable, fertile somatic hybrids obtained using protoplast fusion | Kumari et al. 2018Footnote 96 |
S. alba and B. juncea | Produced hybrid using ovary culture. Successful only when B. juncea was female parent. | Mohapatra and Bajaj 1987Footnote 97 |
Raphanus sativus and S. alba | Hybrids were obtained using ovary culture followed by embryo culture or embryo culture only. | Bang et al. 1996Footnote 88 |
S. alba and Brassica rapa | Obtained self-fertile hybrids using ovary culture when B. rapa was the female parent. Crossing was unsuccessful when S. alba was the female parent. | Jandurová and Dolezel 1995Footnote 98 |
5.2 Potential for introgression of genetic information from S. alba into relatives
S. alba contains many agronomic traits that may contribute to breeding programs for related species, including insect and disease resistance. There have been many efforts to cross S. alba with other cultivated species. Despite this, successful gene introgression has only been demonstrated into B. napus for yellow seed colourFootnote 96,Footnote 99.
An OECD report concluded that the possibility of introgression from S. alba to B. napus under natural conditions is extremely lowFootnote 47.
No reports of naturally occurring gene flow between S. alba and other crops, weeds, or wild species were found in the literature. The potential for introgression of genetic information from S. alba into wild relatives is undetermined.
6. Potential interaction of S. alba with other life forms
The interactions of S. alba with other life forms in Canada have not been extensively studied in agricultural environments. Naumkin and Velkova (2013) identify and quantify insect pollinators in Russian S. alba fieldsFootnote 31. Information on the management of many diseases and insect pests of S. alba can be found in provincial publicationsFootnote 7,Footnote 15,Footnote 37.
S. alba is resistant, or has some tolerance, to some insect pests and diseases. However, damage may still occur depending on pest pressure, timing, and whether other stressors are present. Diseases S. alba is resistant or tolerant to include:
- Alternaria diseases (moderate tolerance only)Footnote 100
- Heterodera schachtii (beet cyst nematode)Footnote 101
and insect pests include:
- cabbage seedpod weevil (Ceutorhynchus obstrictus)Footnote 15,Footnote 102
- flea beetlesFootnote 15,Footnote 103
- aphidsFootnote 102
The most common diseases of S. alba in Canada include:
- damping off (Phytophthora cactorum and/or Pythium spp.)
- wirestem and brown girdling root rot (Rhizoctonia solani)
- Sclerotinia white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum)
- white rust/staghead (Albugo candida)
- Alternaria diseases: black spot, gray leaf spot, and pod spot (Alternaria brassicae and/or Alternaria brassicola)
- white leaf spot/grey stem (Mycosphaerella capsellae)
- aster yellows (aster yellows phytoplasma)
- clubroot (Plasmodiophora brassicae)Footnote 7,Footnote 15
Insect pests of S. alba include:
- cutworm
- grasshoppers
- diamond back moth (Plutella xylostell) (does not overwinter in Canada)
- Bertha armyworm (Mamestra configurata)Footnote 7,Footnote 15,Footnote 102
Please refer to the tables below for examples of interactions of S. alba with other life forms during its life cycle:
- Table 3: Fungi
- Table 4: Chromist
- Table 5: Phytoplasma
- Table 6: Insects
- Table 7: Animals
- Table 8: Plants
Abbreviation list for tables
- BC – British Columbia
- AB – Alberta
- SK – Saskatchewan
- MB – Manitoba
- ON – Ontario
- QC – Quebec
- NB – New Brunswick
- NS – Nova Scotia
- PE – Prince Edward Island
- NL – Newfoundland & Labrador
Fungi | Interaction with Sinapis alba (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer) |
Presence in Canada | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|
alternaria diseases: black spot, gray leaf spot, pod spot
|
pathogen |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 |
black leg
|
pathogen |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 |
damping-off
|
pathogen |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 |
downy mildew
|
pathogen |
YK, ON, MB, AB, BC |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 CABI (Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International) 2021Footnote 104 |
fusarium wilt
|
pathogen |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 |
grey stem and white leaf spot
|
pathogen |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 |
sclerotinia white mold
|
pathogen |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 Government of Manitoba undatedFootnote 37 |
sore shin, damping-off, brown girdling root rot
|
pathogen |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 |
white rust/staghead
|
pathogen |
widespread |
Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 |
Chromist | Interaction with Sinapis alba (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer) |
Presence in Canada | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|
clubroot
|
pathogen |
reported in all provinces |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 CABI (Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International) 2021Footnote 104 |
Phytoplasma | Interaction with Sinapis alba (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer) |
Presence in Canada | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|
aster yellows
|
pathogen |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 |
Insects | Interaction with Sinapis alba (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer) |
Presence in Canada | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|
aphids including
|
consumer |
widespread |
Brown et al. 1999Footnote 102 |
bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata Walker |
consumer |
BC, MB, SK, AB |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 Government of Manitoba undatedFootnote 37 Government of ManitobaFootnote 106 |
cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus obstrictus |
consumer |
BC, AB, MB, SK, QB, ON |
Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 Brown et al. 1999Footnote 102 Canola Council of Canada 2021Footnote 105 |
cutworm spp. including
|
consumer |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 Government of Manitoba undatedFootnote 37 |
diamond back moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) |
consumer |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 Government of Manitoba undatedFootnote 37 Brown et al. 1999Footnote 102 |
flea beetles including
|
consumer |
widespread |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 Government of Manitoba undatedFootnote 37 Brown et al. 1999Footnote 102 Bodnaryk and Lamb 1991Footnote 103 |
grasshoppers |
consumer |
widespread |
Alberta Government 2010Footnote 15 Government of Manitoba undatedFootnote 37 Government of ManitobaFootnote 106 |
green lacewings (family: Chrysopidae) |
symbiont or beneficial organism |
widespread |
Government of ManitobaFootnote 106 |
ground beetles (family: Carabidae) |
symbiont or beneficial organism |
widespread |
Government of ManitobaFootnote 106 |
honey bee, Apis Mellifera L. |
symbiont or beneficial organism |
widespread |
Masierowska and Piętka 2014Footnote 29 |
hover fly (family: Syrphidae) |
symbiont or beneficial organism |
widespread |
Government of ManitobaFootnote 106 |
lady beetles (family: Coccinellidae) |
symbiont or beneficial organism |
widespread |
Government of ManitobaFootnote 106 |
parasitic wasps including families
|
symbiont or beneficial organism |
widespread |
Government of ManitobaFootnote 106 |
red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana Brown |
consumer |
AB, MB, SK |
Saskatchewan Mustard Development Commission 2021Footnote 7 Government of ManitobaFootnote 106 |
solitary bees including families
|
symbiont or beneficial organism |
widespread |
Masierowska and Piętka 2014Footnote 29 |
rove beetles (family: Staphylinidae) |
symbiont or beneficial organism |
widespread |
Government of ManitobaFootnote 106 |
Animals | Interaction with Sinapis alba (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer) |
Presence in Canada | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|
animal browsers including
|
consumer |
widespread |
OECD Working Group on the Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology 2012Footnote 47 |
birds |
consumer |
widespread |
OECD Working Group on the Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology 2012Footnote 47 |
earthworms |
symbiont or beneficial organism |
widespread |
Lohmann et al. 2009Footnote 107 |
Plants | Interaction with Sinapis alba (pathogen; symbiont or beneficial organism; consumer; gene transfer) |
Presence in Canada | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|
wild mustard, Sinapis arvensis L. |
related weed species |
widespread |
Warwick et al. 2000Footnote 17 |